From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:17:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 11/11] clocksource: efm32: Use CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC for defining features In-Reply-To: <1427746633-9137-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> References: <5519AEB2.8050306@linaro.org> <1427746633-9137-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1427746633-9137-11-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Viresh Kumar We have used CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC instead of CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC while defining features. Fix it. Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-Koenig Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c index ec57ba2..5b6e3d5 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/time-efm32.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static irqreturn_t efm32_clock_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) static struct efm32_clock_event_ddata clock_event_ddata = { .evtdev = { .name = "efm32 clockevent", - .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC, + .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC, .set_mode = efm32_clock_event_set_mode, .set_next_event = efm32_clock_event_set_next_event, .rating = 200, -- 1.9.1