* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-05-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5 Nicolas Frattaroli
@ 2025-06-04 8:24 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-06-05 15:14 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-11 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Diederik de Haas @ 2025-06-04 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Frattaroli, Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Heiko Stuebner, Sascha Hauer, Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, kernel, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3825 bytes --]
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri May 30, 2025 at 3:38 PM CEST, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> <snip>
> Downstream has some special case handling for a hardware version where
> not just the control bits differ, but also the register. Since I don't
> know whether that hardware version is in any production silicon, it's
> left unimplemented for now, with an error message urging users to report
> if they have such a system.
> <snip>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 54effb63519653d20b40eed88681330983399a77..5a2c9badcc64c552303c2f55c52e5420dec5ffc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -34,15 +34,18 @@
>
> /* DDRMON_CTRL */
> #define DDRMON_CTRL 0x04
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 BIT(6)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 BIT(5)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 BIT(4)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN BIT(3)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23 BIT(2)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN BIT(1)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN BIT(0)
> -#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | \
> + DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 | \
> DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23)
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK GENMASK(8, 7)
>
> #define DDRMON_CH0_WR_NUM 0x20
> #define DDRMON_CH0_RD_NUM 0x24
> @@ -116,13 +119,60 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
> int buswidth[DMC_MAX_CHANNELS];
> int ddrmon_stride;
> bool ddrmon_ctrl_single;
> + u32 lp5_bank_mode;
> + bool lp5_ckr; /* true if in 4:1 command-to-data clock ratio mode */
> unsigned int count_multiplier; /* number of data clocks per count */
> };
>
> +static int rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi, u32 *ctrl,
> + u32 *mask)
> +{
> + u32 ddrmon_ver;
> +
> + *mask = DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK;
> +
> + switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> + break;
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> + break;
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> + ddrmon_ver = readl_relaxed(dfi->regs);
> + if (ddrmon_ver < 0x40) {
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | dfi->lp5_bank_mode;
> + *mask |= DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * As it is unknown whether the unpleasant special case
> + * behaviour used by the vendor kernel is needed for any
> + * shipping hardware, ask users to report if they have
> + * some of that hardware.
> + */
> + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev,
> + "unsupported DDRMON version 0x%04X, please let linux-rockchip know!\n",
> + ddrmon_ver);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
I'm guessing you mean the linux-rockchip mailing list here? If so, I
think it's better to make that explicit as 'Joe User' who may run into
this issue may not be aware of that mailing list. The 'linux' and
'rockchip' name combo is used in quite a few places.
Cheers,
Diederik
> + default:
> + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev, "unsupported memory type 0x%X\n",
> + dfi->ddr_type);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> {
> void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> int i, ret = 0;
> + u32 ctrl;
> + u32 ctrl_mask;
>
> mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
>
> @@ -136,8 +186,11 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> <snip>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-06-04 8:24 ` Diederik de Haas
@ 2025-06-05 15:14 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-05 19:49 ` Diederik de Haas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Frattaroli @ 2025-06-05 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Heiko Stuebner,
Sascha Hauer, Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel,
Diederik de Haas
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, kernel, linux-arm-kernel
Hello Diederik,
On Wednesday, 4 June 2025 10:24:33 Central European Summer Time Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Fri May 30, 2025 at 3:38 PM CEST, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > [...]
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> > + ddrmon_ver = readl_relaxed(dfi->regs);
> > + if (ddrmon_ver < 0x40) {
> > + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | dfi->lp5_bank_mode;
> > + *mask |= DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As it is unknown whether the unpleasant special case
> > + * behaviour used by the vendor kernel is needed for any
> > + * shipping hardware, ask users to report if they have
> > + * some of that hardware.
> > + */
> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev,
> > + "unsupported DDRMON version 0x%04X, please let linux-rockchip know!\n",
> > + ddrmon_ver);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> I'm guessing you mean the linux-rockchip mailing list here? If so, I
> think it's better to make that explicit as 'Joe User' who may run into
> this issue may not be aware of that mailing list. The 'linux' and
> 'rockchip' name combo is used in quite a few places.
I agree it's ambiguous, the message as it is right now is the way it is
because we're not allowed to linebreak user-facing messages for grep-
ability and I also don't want to exceed 100 lines of width (though this
is the one case where we're allowed to).
I suppose I should just replace it with the e-mail address of the list.
That should be clear enough and this error message also won't end up in
random boot logs strewn across the internet if it really is just some
engineering sample hardware or similar that's affected.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
>
> Cheers,
> Diederik
>
> > + default:
> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev, "unsupported memory type 0x%X\n",
> > + dfi->ddr_type);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > {
> > void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> > int i, ret = 0;
> > + u32 ctrl;
> > + u32 ctrl_mask;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
> >
> > @@ -136,8 +186,11 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > <snip>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-06-05 15:14 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
@ 2025-06-05 19:49 ` Diederik de Haas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Diederik de Haas @ 2025-06-05 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Frattaroli, Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Heiko Stuebner, Sascha Hauer, Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, kernel, linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2522 bytes --]
Hi,
On Thu Jun 5, 2025 at 5:14 PM CEST, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 June 2025 10:24:33 Central European Summer Time Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> On Fri May 30, 2025 at 3:38 PM CEST, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
>> > + ddrmon_ver = readl_relaxed(dfi->regs);
>> > + if (ddrmon_ver < 0x40) {
>> > + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | dfi->lp5_bank_mode;
>> > + *mask |= DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK;
>> > + break;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * As it is unknown whether the unpleasant special case
>> > + * behaviour used by the vendor kernel is needed for any
>> > + * shipping hardware, ask users to report if they have
>> > + * some of that hardware.
>> > + */
>> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev,
>> > + "unsupported DDRMON version 0x%04X, please let linux-rockchip know!\n",
>> > + ddrmon_ver);
>> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> I'm guessing you mean the linux-rockchip mailing list here? If so, I
>> think it's better to make that explicit as 'Joe User' who may run into
>> this issue may not be aware of that mailing list. The 'linux' and
>> 'rockchip' name combo is used in quite a few places.
>
> I agree it's ambiguous, the message as it is right now is the way it is
> because we're not allowed to linebreak user-facing messages for grep-
> ability and I also don't want to exceed 100 lines of width (though this
> is the one case where we're allowed to).
>
> I suppose I should just replace it with the e-mail address of the list.
> That should be clear enough and this error message also won't end up in
> random boot logs strewn across the internet if it really is just some
> engineering sample hardware or similar that's affected.
I understand the issue. Maybe this discussion itself will help make it
appear high enough in the search results to fix the ambiguity ;-)
I'll leave it up to you if or how to change anything (or not).
Cheers,
Diederik
>> > + default:
>> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev, "unsupported memory type 0x%X\n",
>> > + dfi->ddr_type);
>> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>> > {
>> > void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>> > int i, ret = 0;
>> > + u32 ctrl;
>> > + u32 ctrl_mask;
>> >
>> > mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
>> >
>> > @@ -136,8 +186,11 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
>> > <snip>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-05-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5 Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-04 8:24 ` Diederik de Haas
@ 2025-06-11 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer
2025-09-06 16:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
2025-09-06 18:37 ` Heiko Stübner
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2025-06-11 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Frattaroli
Cc: Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Heiko Stuebner,
Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel, kernel, linux-pm,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-kernel
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 03:38:09PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3588 SoC can also support LPDDR5 memory. This type of
> memory needs some special case handling in the rockchip-dfi driver.
>
> Add support for it in rockchip-dfi, as well as the needed GRF register
> definitions.
>
> This has been tested as returning both the right cycle count and
> bandwidth on a LPDDR5 board where the CKR bit is 1. I couldn't test
> whether the values are correct on a system where CKR is 0, as I'm not
> savvy enough with the Rockchip tooling to know whether this can be set
> in the DDR init blob.
>
> Downstream has some special case handling for a hardware version where
> not just the control bits differ, but also the register. Since I don't
> know whether that hardware version is in any production silicon, it's
> left unimplemented for now, with an error message urging users to report
> if they have such a system.
>
> There is a slight change of behaviour for non-LPDDR5 systems: instead of
> writing 0 as the control flags to the control register and pretending
> everything is alright if the memory type is unknown, we now explicitly
> return an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -147,21 +200,7 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN),
> dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
>
> - /* set ddr type to dfi */
> - switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> - break;
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, ctrl_mask),
> dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
You could move the HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, ctrl_mask) to
rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl() and by that you only have to pass one
u32* to that function.
That's just nitpicking though, so for the series:
Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-05-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5 Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-04 8:24 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-06-11 7:32 ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2025-09-06 16:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
2025-09-06 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2025-09-06 18:37 ` Heiko Stübner
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2025-09-06 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Frattaroli
Cc: Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Heiko Stuebner,
Sascha Hauer, Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel, kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-kernel
Hi,
I'm sorry for late reply.
Looks good to me. But, this patch contains the change of following header.
If there are ACK about change in include/soc/rockchip, I'll merge this series.
include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 10:39 PM Nicolas Frattaroli
<nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> The Rockchip RK3588 SoC can also support LPDDR5 memory. This type of
> memory needs some special case handling in the rockchip-dfi driver.
>
> Add support for it in rockchip-dfi, as well as the needed GRF register
> definitions.
>
> This has been tested as returning both the right cycle count and
> bandwidth on a LPDDR5 board where the CKR bit is 1. I couldn't test
> whether the values are correct on a system where CKR is 0, as I'm not
> savvy enough with the Rockchip tooling to know whether this can be set
> in the DDR init blob.
>
> Downstream has some special case handling for a hardware version where
> not just the control bits differ, but also the register. Since I don't
> know whether that hardware version is in any production silicon, it's
> left unimplemented for now, with an error message urging users to report
> if they have such a system.
>
> There is a slight change of behaviour for non-LPDDR5 systems: instead of
> writing 0 as the control flags to the control register and pretending
> everything is alright if the memory type is unknown, we now explicitly
> return an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 54effb63519653d20b40eed88681330983399a77..5a2c9badcc64c552303c2f55c52e5420dec5ffc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -34,15 +34,18 @@
>
> /* DDRMON_CTRL */
> #define DDRMON_CTRL 0x04
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 BIT(6)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 BIT(5)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 BIT(4)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN BIT(3)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23 BIT(2)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN BIT(1)
> #define DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN BIT(0)
> -#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | \
> + DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 | \
> DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23)
> +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK GENMASK(8, 7)
>
> #define DDRMON_CH0_WR_NUM 0x20
> #define DDRMON_CH0_RD_NUM 0x24
> @@ -116,13 +119,60 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
> int buswidth[DMC_MAX_CHANNELS];
> int ddrmon_stride;
> bool ddrmon_ctrl_single;
> + u32 lp5_bank_mode;
> + bool lp5_ckr; /* true if in 4:1 command-to-data clock ratio mode */
> unsigned int count_multiplier; /* number of data clocks per count */
> };
>
> +static int rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi, u32 *ctrl,
> + u32 *mask)
> +{
> + u32 ddrmon_ver;
> +
> + *mask = DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK;
> +
> + switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> + break;
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> + break;
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> + ddrmon_ver = readl_relaxed(dfi->regs);
> + if (ddrmon_ver < 0x40) {
> + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | dfi->lp5_bank_mode;
> + *mask |= DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * As it is unknown whether the unpleasant special case
> + * behaviour used by the vendor kernel is needed for any
> + * shipping hardware, ask users to report if they have
> + * some of that hardware.
> + */
> + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev,
> + "unsupported DDRMON version 0x%04X, please let linux-rockchip know!\n",
> + ddrmon_ver);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + default:
> + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev, "unsupported memory type 0x%X\n",
> + dfi->ddr_type);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> {
> void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> int i, ret = 0;
> + u32 ctrl;
> + u32 ctrl_mask;
>
> mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
>
> @@ -136,8 +186,11 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + ret = rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl(dfi, &ctrl, &ctrl_mask);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < dfi->max_channels; i++) {
> - u32 ctrl = 0;
>
> if (!(dfi->channel_mask & BIT(i)))
> continue;
> @@ -147,21 +200,7 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN),
> dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
>
> - /* set ddr type to dfi */
> - switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> - break;
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, ctrl_mask),
> dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
>
> /* enable count, use software mode */
> @@ -652,6 +691,7 @@ static int rockchip_ddr_perf_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> break;
> case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> dfi->burst_len = 16;
> break;
> }
> @@ -730,7 +770,7 @@ static int rk3568_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> static int rk3588_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> {
> struct regmap *regmap_pmu = dfi->regmap_pmu;
> - u32 reg2, reg3, reg4;
> + u32 reg2, reg3, reg4, reg6;
>
> regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, ®2);
> regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3, ®3);
> @@ -757,6 +797,14 @@ static int rk3588_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> dfi->ddrmon_stride = 0x4000;
> dfi->count_multiplier = 2;
>
> + if (dfi->ddr_type == ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5) {
> + regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6, ®6);
> + dfi->lp5_bank_mode = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_BANK_MODE, reg6) << 7;
> + dfi->lp5_ckr = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_CKR, reg6);
> + if (dfi->lp5_ckr)
> + dfi->count_multiplier *= 2;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> index 630b35a550640e57f1b5a50dfbe362653a7cbcc1..02a7b2432d9942e15a77424c44fefec189faaa33 100644
> --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
> #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3 GENMASK(13, 12)
> #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION GENMASK(31, 28)
>
> -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6 0x218
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_BANK_MODE GENMASK(2, 1)
> +/* Whether the LPDDR5 is in 2:1 (= 0) or 4:1 (= 1) CKR a.k.a. DQS mode */
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_CKR BIT(0)
>
> #endif /* __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H */
> diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> index e46fd72aea8d1f649768a3269b85176dacceef0e..41c7bb26fd5387df85e5b58186b67bf74706f360 100644
> --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum {
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3 = 6,
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4 = 7,
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X = 8,
> + ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5 = 9,
> };
>
> #endif /* __SOC_ROCKCHIP_GRF_H */
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-09-06 16:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
@ 2025-09-06 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2025-09-06 22:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-09-06 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Frattaroli, Chanwoo Choi
Cc: Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Sascha Hauer,
Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel, kernel, linux-pm,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-kernel
Hi,
Am Samstag, 6. September 2025, 18:09:53 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> I'm sorry for late reply.
>
> Looks good to me. But, this patch contains the change of following header.
> If there are ACK about change in include/soc/rockchip, I'll merge this series.
>
> include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
done :-)
Thanks
Heiko
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 10:39 PM Nicolas Frattaroli
> <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Rockchip RK3588 SoC can also support LPDDR5 memory. This type of
> > memory needs some special case handling in the rockchip-dfi driver.
> >
> > Add support for it in rockchip-dfi, as well as the needed GRF register
> > definitions.
> >
> > This has been tested as returning both the right cycle count and
> > bandwidth on a LPDDR5 board where the CKR bit is 1. I couldn't test
> > whether the values are correct on a system where CKR is 0, as I'm not
> > savvy enough with the Rockchip tooling to know whether this can be set
> > in the DDR init blob.
> >
> > Downstream has some special case handling for a hardware version where
> > not just the control bits differ, but also the register. Since I don't
> > know whether that hardware version is in any production silicon, it's
> > left unimplemented for now, with an error message urging users to report
> > if they have such a system.
> >
> > There is a slight change of behaviour for non-LPDDR5 systems: instead of
> > writing 0 as the control flags to the control register and pretending
> > everything is alright if the memory type is unknown, we now explicitly
> > return an error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> > include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > index 54effb63519653d20b40eed88681330983399a77..5a2c9badcc64c552303c2f55c52e5420dec5ffc1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> > @@ -34,15 +34,18 @@
> >
> > /* DDRMON_CTRL */
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL 0x04
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 BIT(6)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 BIT(5)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 BIT(4)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN BIT(3)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23 BIT(2)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN BIT(1)
> > #define DDRMON_CTRL_TIMER_CNT_EN BIT(0)
> > -#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK (DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | \
> > + DDRMON_CTRL_DDR4 | \
> > DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4 | \
> > DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23)
> > +#define DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK GENMASK(8, 7)
> >
> > #define DDRMON_CH0_WR_NUM 0x20
> > #define DDRMON_CH0_RD_NUM 0x24
> > @@ -116,13 +119,60 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
> > int buswidth[DMC_MAX_CHANNELS];
> > int ddrmon_stride;
> > bool ddrmon_ctrl_single;
> > + u32 lp5_bank_mode;
> > + bool lp5_ckr; /* true if in 4:1 command-to-data clock ratio mode */
> > unsigned int count_multiplier; /* number of data clocks per count */
> > };
> >
> > +static int rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi, u32 *ctrl,
> > + u32 *mask)
> > +{
> > + u32 ddrmon_ver;
> > +
> > + *mask = DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK;
> > +
> > + switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> > + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> > + break;
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> > + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> > + break;
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> > + ddrmon_ver = readl_relaxed(dfi->regs);
> > + if (ddrmon_ver < 0x40) {
> > + *ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR5 | dfi->lp5_bank_mode;
> > + *mask |= DDRMON_CTRL_LP5_BANK_MODE_MASK;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As it is unknown whether the unpleasant special case
> > + * behaviour used by the vendor kernel is needed for any
> > + * shipping hardware, ask users to report if they have
> > + * some of that hardware.
> > + */
> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev,
> > + "unsupported DDRMON version 0x%04X, please let linux-rockchip know!\n",
> > + ddrmon_ver);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + default:
> > + dev_err(&dfi->edev->dev, "unsupported memory type 0x%X\n",
> > + dfi->ddr_type);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > {
> > void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> > int i, ret = 0;
> > + u32 ctrl;
> > + u32 ctrl_mask;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dfi->mutex);
> >
> > @@ -136,8 +186,11 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = rockchip_dfi_ddrtype_to_ctrl(dfi, &ctrl, &ctrl_mask);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i < dfi->max_channels; i++) {
> > - u32 ctrl = 0;
> >
> > if (!(dfi->channel_mask & BIT(i)))
> > continue;
> > @@ -147,21 +200,7 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > DDRMON_CTRL_SOFTWARE_EN | DDRMON_CTRL_HARDWARE_EN),
> > dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> >
> > - /* set ddr type to dfi */
> > - switch (dfi->ddr_type) {
> > - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR2:
> > - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3:
> > - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR23;
> > - break;
> > - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> > - case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> > - ctrl = DDRMON_CTRL_LPDDR4;
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -
> > - writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, DDRMON_CTRL_DDR_TYPE_MASK),
> > + writel_relaxed(HIWORD_UPDATE(ctrl, ctrl_mask),
> > dfi_regs + i * dfi->ddrmon_stride + DDRMON_CTRL);
> >
> > /* enable count, use software mode */
> > @@ -652,6 +691,7 @@ static int rockchip_ddr_perf_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > break;
> > case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4:
> > case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X:
> > + case ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5:
> > dfi->burst_len = 16;
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -730,7 +770,7 @@ static int rk3568_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > static int rk3588_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > {
> > struct regmap *regmap_pmu = dfi->regmap_pmu;
> > - u32 reg2, reg3, reg4;
> > + u32 reg2, reg3, reg4, reg6;
> >
> > regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, ®2);
> > regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3, ®3);
> > @@ -757,6 +797,14 @@ static int rk3588_dfi_init(struct rockchip_dfi *dfi)
> > dfi->ddrmon_stride = 0x4000;
> > dfi->count_multiplier = 2;
> >
> > + if (dfi->ddr_type == ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5) {
> > + regmap_read(regmap_pmu, RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6, ®6);
> > + dfi->lp5_bank_mode = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_BANK_MODE, reg6) << 7;
> > + dfi->lp5_ckr = FIELD_GET(RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_CKR, reg6);
> > + if (dfi->lp5_ckr)
> > + dfi->count_multiplier *= 2;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> > index 630b35a550640e57f1b5a50dfbe362653a7cbcc1..02a7b2432d9942e15a77424c44fefec189faaa33 100644
> > --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> > +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> > @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
> > #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3 GENMASK(13, 12)
> > #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION GENMASK(31, 28)
> >
> > -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> > -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> > +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> > +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> > +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6 0x218
> > +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_BANK_MODE GENMASK(2, 1)
> > +/* Whether the LPDDR5 is in 2:1 (= 0) or 4:1 (= 1) CKR a.k.a. DQS mode */
> > +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_CKR BIT(0)
> >
> > #endif /* __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H */
> > diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> > index e46fd72aea8d1f649768a3269b85176dacceef0e..41c7bb26fd5387df85e5b58186b67bf74706f360 100644
> > --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> > +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum {
> > ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3 = 6,
> > ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4 = 7,
> > ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X = 8,
> > + ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5 = 9,
> > };
> >
> > #endif /* __SOC_ROCKCHIP_GRF_H */
> >
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
> >
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-09-06 18:38 ` Heiko Stübner
@ 2025-09-06 22:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2025-09-06 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner
Cc: Nicolas Frattaroli, Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park,
Sascha Hauer, Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel, kernel,
linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-kernel
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 7, 2025 at 3:38 AM Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, 6. September 2025, 18:09:53 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> > I'm sorry for late reply.
> >
> > Looks good to me. But, this patch contains the change of following header.
> > If there are ACK about change in include/soc/rockchip, I'll merge this series.
> >
> > include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h | 8 +++-
> > include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h | 1 +
>
> done :-)
Thanks.
Applied it.
(snip)
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5
2025-05-30 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for LPDDR5 Nicolas Frattaroli
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-06 16:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
@ 2025-09-06 18:37 ` Heiko Stübner
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-09-06 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chanwoo Choi, MyungJoo Ham, Kyungmin Park, Sascha Hauer,
Jonathan Cameron, Sebastian Reichel, Nicolas Frattaroli
Cc: kernel, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-kernel,
Nicolas Frattaroli
Am Freitag, 30. Mai 2025, 15:38:09 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Nicolas Frattaroli:
> The Rockchip RK3588 SoC can also support LPDDR5 memory. This type of
> memory needs some special case handling in the rockchip-dfi driver.
>
> Add support for it in rockchip-dfi, as well as the needed GRF register
> definitions.
>
> This has been tested as returning both the right cycle count and
> bandwidth on a LPDDR5 board where the CKR bit is 1. I couldn't test
> whether the values are correct on a system where CKR is 0, as I'm not
> savvy enough with the Rockchip tooling to know whether this can be set
> in the DDR init blob.
>
> Downstream has some special case handling for a hardware version where
> not just the control bits differ, but also the register. Since I don't
> know whether that hardware version is in any production silicon, it's
> left unimplemented for now, with an error message urging users to report
> if they have such a system.
>
> There is a slight change of behaviour for non-LPDDR5 systems: instead of
> writing 0 as the control flags to the control register and pretending
> everything is alright if the memory type is unknown, we now explicitly
> return an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
header additions
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> index 630b35a550640e57f1b5a50dfbe362653a7cbcc1..02a7b2432d9942e15a77424c44fefec189faaa33 100644
> --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rk3588_grf.h
> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
> #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_DRAMTYPE_INFO_V3 GENMASK(13, 12)
> #define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG3_SYSREG_VERSION GENMASK(31, 28)
>
> -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> -#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG4 0x210
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG5 0x214
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6 0x218
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_BANK_MODE GENMASK(2, 1)
> +/* Whether the LPDDR5 is in 2:1 (= 0) or 4:1 (= 1) CKR a.k.a. DQS mode */
> +#define RK3588_PMUGRF_OS_REG6_LP5_CKR BIT(0)
>
> #endif /* __SOC_RK3588_GRF_H */
> diff --git a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> index e46fd72aea8d1f649768a3269b85176dacceef0e..41c7bb26fd5387df85e5b58186b67bf74706f360 100644
> --- a/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> +++ b/include/soc/rockchip/rockchip_grf.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum {
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR3 = 6,
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4 = 7,
> ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR4X = 8,
> + ROCKCHIP_DDRTYPE_LPDDR5 = 9,
> };
>
> #endif /* __SOC_ROCKCHIP_GRF_H */
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread