From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 09:26:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group() In-Reply-To: <55420A18.7080203@arm.com> References: <20150409144029.GE9648@leverpostej> <1428591425-17330-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <20150409153629.GI9648@leverpostej> <20150413124121.GF2869@arm.com> <55420A18.7080203@arm.com> Message-ID: <1430400394.24034.67.camel@deneb.redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 11:55 +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > On 13/04/15 13:41, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:36:29PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote: > >>> Currently in validate_group(), there is a static initializer > >>> for fake_pmu.used_mask which is based on CPU_BITS_NONE but > >>> the used_mask array size is based on CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS. > >>> CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_EVENTS is not based on NR_CPUS, so CPU_BITS_NONE > >>> is not correct and will cause a build failure if NR_CPUS > >>> is set high enough to make CPU_BITS_NONE larger than used_mask. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland > >> > >> Arnd, Olof, are you happy to take this via arm-soc? > >> > >> My (broken) patch went via Will's tree because of a perf dependency, but > >> other CCI patches have gone via you guys. > > > > Yeah, arm-soc is the best place for this. You should resend to > > arm at kernel.org as a new patch with the relevant acks. > Mark > > Could you please send this to arm-soc as suggested by Will, with the > relevant acks/reviews ? > I sent it on Tuesday. Did it not show up? Is arm at kernel.org the correct address? I got the cc: From: Mark Salter To: arm at kernel.org Cc: Mark Salter Subject: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group() Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:09:32 -0400 Message-Id: <1430240972-16386-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com>