[PATCH 2/2] doc: dt: add documentation for lpc1850-rgu reset driver

[p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)]

Hi Joachim,

please Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org for new device tree binding
documentation.

Am Dienstag, den 28.04.2015, 00:30 +0200 schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
> Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/nxp,lpc1850-rgu.txt  | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/nxp,lpc1850-rgu.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/nxp,lpc1850-rgu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/nxp,lpc1850-rgu.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..45dbd6087731
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/nxp,lpc1850-rgu.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +NXP LPC1850  Reset Generation Unit (RGU)
> +========================================
> +
> +Please also refer to reset.txt in this directory for common reset
> +controller binding usage.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "nxp,lpc1850-rgu"
> +- reg: register base and length
> +- clocks: phandle and clock specifier to RGU clocks
> +- clock-names: should contain "delay" and "reg"
> +- #reset-cells: should be 1
> +
> +Refer to NXP LPC18xx or LPC43xx user manual for a description of the
> +reset signals and the connected block/peripheral.
> +
> +Reset provider example:
> +rgu: reset-controller at 40053000 {
> +	compatible = "nxp,lpc1850-rgu";
> +	reg = <0x40053000 0x1000>;
> +	clocks = <&cgu BASE_SAFE_CLK>, <&ccu1 CLK_CPU_BUS>;
> +	clock-names = "delay", "reg";
> +	#reset-cells = <1>;
> +};
> +
> +Reset consumer example:
> +mac: ethernet at 40010000 {
> +	compatible = "nxp,lpc1850-dwmac", "snps,dwmac-3.611", "snps,dwmac";
> +	reg = <0x40010000 0x2000>;
> +	interrupts = <5>;
> +	interrupt-names = "macirq";
> +	clocks = <&ccu1 CLK_CPU_ETHERNET>;
> +	clock-names = "stmmaceth";
> +	resets = <&rgu 22>;

I'd like the reset numbers to be documented in the binding docs. The
reset ordering seems to be the same across all users of this core?

Personally, I'd even prefer #defines like you have for the clock
indices. I know others dislike this, though.

> +	reset-names = "stmmaceth";
> +	status = "disabled";
> +};
> +
 ^^
Superfluous whitespace.

regards
Philipp