From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] arm64: smp: consistently use error codes
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 12:36:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431085004-32743-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431085004-32743-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
cpu_kill currently returns one for success and zero for failure, which
is unlike all the other cpu_operations, which return zero for success
and an error code upon failure. This difference is unnecessarily
confusing.
Make cpu_kill consistent with the other cpu_operations.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 7 +++----
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
index ea18cb5..10fa25e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
int err, i;
if (!psci_ops.affinity_info)
- return 1;
+ return 0;
/*
* cpu_kill could race with cpu_die and we can
* potentially end up declaring this cpu undead
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
err = psci_ops.affinity_info(cpu_logical_map(cpu), 0);
if (err == PSCI_0_2_AFFINITY_LEVEL_OFF) {
pr_info("CPU%d killed.\n", cpu);
- return 1;
+ return 0;
}
msleep(10);
@@ -518,8 +518,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
pr_warn("CPU%d may not have shut down cleanly (AFFINITY_INFO reports %d)\n",
cpu, err);
- /* Make op_cpu_kill() fail. */
- return 0;
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
#endif
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 2cb0081..3799df2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static int op_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
* time and hope that it's dead, so let's skip the wait and just hope.
*/
if (!cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_kill)
- return 1;
+ return 0;
return cpu_ops[cpu]->cpu_kill(cpu);
}
@@ -261,6 +261,8 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
*/
void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
{
+ int err;
+
if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_died, msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
pr_crit("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n", cpu);
return;
@@ -273,8 +275,10 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
* verify that it has really left the kernel before we consider
* clobbering anything it might still be using.
*/
- if (!op_cpu_kill(cpu))
- pr_warn("CPU%d may not have shut down cleanly\n", cpu);
+ err = op_cpu_kill(cpu);
+ if (err)
+ pr_warn("CPU%d may not have shut down cleanly: %d\n",
+ cpu, err);
}
/*
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-08 11:36 [PATCH 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 01/12] arm/arm64: kvm: add missing PSCI include Mark Rutland
2015-05-12 14:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 02/12] arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 04/12] arm64: psci: remove unnecessary id indirection Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 05/12] arm64: psci: support unsigned return values Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 12:25 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-11 12:39 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 06/12] arm64: psci: account for Trusted OS instances Mark Rutland
2015-05-13 14:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-18 10:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-15 15:06 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-18 9:24 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 07/12] arm64: psci: kill psci_power_state Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 15:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] arm64: psci: remove ACPI coupling Mark Rutland
2015-05-15 15:10 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 09/12] arm64: psci: factor invocation code to drivers Mark Rutland
2015-05-13 9:40 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 10/12] drivers: psci: support native SMC{32,64} calls Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/12] ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code Mark Rutland
2015-05-15 15:41 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-15 15:43 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-18 9:46 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-18 19:14 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-26 12:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-08 11:36 ` [PATCH 12/12] MAINTAINERS: add PSCI entry Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431085004-32743-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).