From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 08:41:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431326520-17331-7-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431326520-17331-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
There are two problems with the UEFI stub DT memory node removal
routine:
- it deletes nodes as it traverses the tree, which happens to work
but is not supported, as deletion invalidates the node iterator;
- deleting memory nodes entirely may discard annotations in the form
of additional properties on the nodes.
Now that the UEFI initialization has moved to an earlier stage, we can
actually just ignore any memblocks that are installed after we have
processed the UEFI memory map. This way, it is no longer necessary to
remove the nodes, so we can remove that logic from the stub as well.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 7 +++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c | 24 +-----------------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 64480b65ef17..95c239f43384 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -386,6 +386,13 @@ __setup("keepinitrd", keepinitrd_setup);
void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
{
+ /*
+ * EFI_MEMMAP will be set /after/ UEFI has installed all memory based
+ * on the content of the UEFI memory map.
+ */
+ if (efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
+ return;
+
if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(base)) {
if (size < PAGE_SIZE - (base & ~PAGE_MASK)) {
pr_warn("Ignoring memory block 0x%llx - 0x%llx\n",
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
index ef5d764e2a27..343e7992bd8f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/fdt.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
unsigned long map_size, unsigned long desc_size,
u32 desc_ver)
{
- int node, prev, num_rsv;
+ int node, num_rsv;
int status;
u32 fdt_val32;
u64 fdt_val64;
@@ -54,28 +54,6 @@ efi_status_t update_fdt(efi_system_table_t *sys_table, void *orig_fdt,
goto fdt_set_fail;
/*
- * Delete any memory nodes present. We must delete nodes which
- * early_init_dt_scan_memory may try to use.
- */
- prev = 0;
- for (;;) {
- const char *type;
- int len;
-
- node = fdt_next_node(fdt, prev, NULL);
- if (node < 0)
- break;
-
- type = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "device_type", &len);
- if (type && strncmp(type, "memory", len) == 0) {
- fdt_del_node(fdt, node);
- continue;
- }
-
- prev = node;
- }
-
- /*
* Delete all memory reserve map entries. When booting via UEFI,
* kernel will use the UEFI memory map to find reserved regions.
*/
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 6:41 [PATCH 0/8] arm64 UEFI early FDT handling Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 1/8] of/fdt: split off FDT self reservation from memreserve processing Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-22 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-01 7:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 9:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 10:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 11:02 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 11:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 11:18 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: use fixmap region for permanent FDT mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-06-01 9:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-01 9:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: override early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 4/8] efi: move FDT handling to separate object file Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-26 18:15 ` Matt Fleming
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64/efi: move EFI init before early FDT processing Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2015-05-11 16:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memory nodes instead of removing them Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2015-05-12 14:31 ` Leif Lindholm
2015-05-12 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:41 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64/efi: ignore DT memreserve entries " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-05-11 6:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64/efi: adapt to relaxed FDT placement requirements Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431326520-17331-7-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).