From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: eddie.huang@mediatek.com (Eddie Huang)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:33:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] I2C: mediatek: Add driver for MediaTek I2C
 controller
In-Reply-To: <20150519194917.GI24769@pengutronix.de>
References: <1431967209-5261-1-git-send-email-eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
 <1431967209-5261-3-git-send-email-eddie.huang@mediatek.com>
 <20150518184300.GB28888@pengutronix.de>
 <CABuKBeJcpufi-eEWmDRK6F2kgpz3DmCz8rp4hVPCJVgkmGr-KA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150519194917.GI24769@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <1432100032.3422.13.camel@mtksdaap41>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Uwe,

On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 21:49 +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Hello Matthias,
> 
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:48:23PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 2015-05-18 20:43 GMT+02:00 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:40:08AM +0800, Eddie Huang wrote:
> > >> [...]
> > >>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 675 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> [...]
> > >> +#define I2C_DRV_NAME         "mt-i2c"
> > > i2c-mt65xx ?
> > 
> > As this works for all SoCs so far, I would propose: i2c-mtk
> Hmm, currently we have:
> 
>   - #define I2C_DRV_NAME mt-i2c
Change to i2c-mt65xx.

>   - dt-compatibles: "mediatek,mt6577-i2c" + "mediatek,mt6589-i2c"

We hope all mobile chip series use the same I2C driver.
I don't list all chips in driver to avoid too many dt-compatibles.
Only list chips that are different from others.

>   - function prefix: mtk_i2c_
Maybe use i2c-mt65xx_ is better, but I tend to keep mtk_i2c_ after these
review rounds.

>   - filename: i2c-mt65xx.c
>   - Kconfig symbol: I2C_MT65XX
> 
> Getting some harmonization here would definitly be nice.
> 

Eddie Huang