From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02FAC19776 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:48:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UUxYy44GRIO4cQdUKxtZBENf+y127GHIZ7y6niKwD+c=; b=4TlUO6HbRG+wBM iRPv8M6LZ51T82NmkjiMo/mJp1ZI07aYPuYSS3uJmX9PbpUH1ogzUJpYBfjtbtFVsK8vbxYTbDVlz kjgTjEkJwBo43zR8NN+aaZqVNtPPBiiwIRMQFgkDnqP+kljgWBoebdRbhuuvbgNsZ25bW4rd0/Nbr Poa20nPAt9P0syZJyTUXTSGJ13W5sjFeUQvNkMASTzG3NnqN9w/u41UpwJ5Qvu20GVFFrkWSdHY2z 5sf8Syy62e6Y7kP7vjdDaizGiPTNscdsmI+m5Ozqh5eOIVkUy/raG+QZDUQztnSyTdQxg3gtplUrx sIXl6GJ34rAgf7VOcZ7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tnyrC-0000000Anel-1CFd; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 11:48:42 +0000 Received: from server.wki.vra.mybluehostin.me ([162.240.238.73]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tny2h-0000000AfXu-3UEP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:56:32 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=couthit.com ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UUxYy44GRIO4cQdUKxtZBENf+y127GHIZ7y6niKwD+c=; b=ll921IZ6bNuWX05m2a5g//QzBa 2JCmTkTA3/84gqEYAA4nwTHgiqA/9K5CQBOS6D9FZZ60vQsZ81Ez+TDzPDQGwuDW8rK+VZNhImWhB lhqApCidqEle+BYlnJG4f9MWK2E3891Cl6d4WRyF/hKDwrrtevIBR/R/exbUjlPquJccsdrAWc/Od ebaySp0lHJ/LM7hHJsncEU34i2VJQC6YTlBrT1gjLnS/W5GXrekrWy75Efy8OTUJFenW/DNlvgbHS KWgGwLXTpMjyGG4BphJWlFUNZrThRzqhTLB7hQvadtlHMjyXAQlT6amUmuDcXkXpAtpAwY24h9Fmi dckhrPHQ==; Received: from [122.175.9.182] (port=22918 helo=zimbra.couthit.local) by server.wki.vra.mybluehostin.me with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tny1x-000000003oR-49Ac; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:46 +0530 Received: from zimbra.couthit.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.couthit.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A87B17840AC; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:38 +0530 (IST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.couthit.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F77F1784068; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:38 +0530 (IST) Received: from zimbra.couthit.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.couthit.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id iYYW2RZnI8rr; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:38 +0530 (IST) Received: from zimbra.couthit.local (zimbra.couthit.local [10.10.10.103]) by zimbra.couthit.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069531782035; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:38 +0530 (IST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:25:37 +0530 (IST) From: Parvathi Pudi To: danishanwar Message-ID: <1432177615.717619.1740740137819.JavaMail.zimbra@couthit.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20250214054702.1073139-1-parvathi@couthit.com> <20250214170219.22730c3b@kernel.org> <1348929889.600853.1739873180072.JavaMail.zimbra@couthit.local> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] PRU-ICSSM Ethernet Driver MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.10.10.103] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3968 (ZimbraWebClient - FF113 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3968) Thread-Topic: PRU-ICSSM Ethernet Driver Thread-Index: AjaAuJTDl7foxdNqzd93kIb2DnSneg== X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.wki.vra.mybluehostin.me X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.infradead.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - couthit.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.wki.vra.mybluehostin.me: authenticated_id: smtp@couthit.com X-Authenticated-Sender: server.wki.vra.mybluehostin.me: smtp@couthit.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250228_025631_893871_7E6CFF37 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nm , Vignesh Raghavendra , praneeth , edumazet , krishna , pmohan , diogo ivo , robh , javier carrasco cruz , m-karicheri2 , basharath , kuba , pabeni , devicetree , conor+dt , schnelle , mohan , richardcochran , Prajith Jayarajan , rogerq , jacob e keller , ssantosh , linux-arm-kernel , rogerq , srk , pratheesh , m-malladi , netdev , linux-kernel , afd , andrew+netdev , parvathi , horms , krzk+dt , davem Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, > On 18/02/25 3:36 pm, Parvathi Pudi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 11:16:52 +0530 parvathi wrote: >>>> The Programmable Real-Time Unit Industrial Communication Sub-system (PRU-ICSS) >>>> is available on the TI SOCs in two flavors: Gigabit ICSS (ICSSG) and the older >>>> Megabit ICSS (ICSSM). >>> >>> Every individual patch must build cleanly with W=1. >>> Otherwise doing git bisections is a miserable experience. >>> -- >> >> As we mentioned in cover letter we have dependency with SOC patch. >> >> "These patches have a dependency on an SOC patch, which we are including at the >> end of this series for reference. The SOC patch has been submitted in a separate >> thread [2] and we are awaiting for it to be merged." >> >> SOC patch need to be applied prior applying the "net" patches. We have changed >> the >> order and appended the SOC patch at the end, because SOC changes need to go into >> linux-next but not into net-next. >> >> We have make sure every individual patch has compiled successfully with W=1 if >> we >> apply SOC patch prior to the "net" patches. >> > > If there is any dependency in the series, the pre-requisite patch should > come before the dependent patch. In this series, SoC Patch should have > been the patch 1/10 and the warnings could have been avoided. > Sure, we will change the order and resubmit the patches in the next version. Thanks and Regards, Parvathi.