From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle) Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 10:22:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] soc: Mediatek: Add SCPSYS power domain driver In-Reply-To: <1432131540-2523-4-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> References: <1432131540-2523-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1432131540-2523-4-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <1432196527.21715.130.camel@x220> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:18 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig > +config MTK_SCPSYS > + bool "MediaTek SCPSYS Support" > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > + select REGMAP > + select MTK_INFRACFG > + help > + Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek SCPSYS power domain > + driver. > +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > +#include > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_scpsys_match_tbl); > + > +static struct platform_driver scpsys_drv = { > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > +}; > + > +module_platform_driver_probe(scpsys_drv, scpsys_probe); (A patch was recently submitted that would allow built-in only code to use builtin_platform_driver_probe(), see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/10/125 .) > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer, Pengutronix"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek MT8173 scpsys driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); MTK_SCPSYS was changed from tristate to bool in this version. As mtk-scpsys.o can now only be built-in I think the above module specific macros can safely be dropped. Probably ditto for the module.h include. Thanks, Paul Bolle