[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Paul Gortmaker]

This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.

Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---

[ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
  for the original series posting.]

 drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 82d2fbb20f7e..4c157302365f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 */
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
-- 
2.2.1

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 04.06.2015 06:18, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
> 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Viresh Kumar]

On 03-06-15, 17:18, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
> 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> ---
> 
> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>   for the original series posting.]
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> index 82d2fbb20f7e..4c157302365f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  */
>  
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
> 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.


> ---
> 
> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>   for the original series posting.]
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> index 82d2fbb20f7e..4c157302365f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  */
>  
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> 
> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
> 
> 
>> ---
>>
>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>>   for the original series posting.]

Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Paul Gortmaker]

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>
>> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>>>   for the original series posting.]
>
> Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?

My fault for not explicitly stating the obvious...  If I don't keep the
patch locally (or at least a version of it) then we can introduce a
compile bisection fail.  So I will keep all patches locally unless there
is a rebase where I can (also) rebase and drop said pach since it
has become common history of the shared baseline...

Paul.
--

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Paul Gortmaker]

On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>>
>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>
>> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>>>   for the original series posting.]
> 
> Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?


I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if
I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection
history, so yes I'll handle it.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

[PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17.06.2015 00:29, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>>>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>>>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>>>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
>>>>   for the original series posting.]
>>
>> Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?
> 
> 
> I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if
> I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection
> history, so yes I'll handle it.

Thank you, I'll leave the patch for you to handle.

Best regards,
Krzysztof