From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 10:27:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Central Direct Memory Access Engine driver support In-Reply-To: References: <1432228035-6569-1-git-send-email-appanad@xilinx.com> <1432290653.27695.97.camel@x220> <557681A7.7080202@monstr.eu> <1433834507.16887.3.camel@x220> <5576956B.7050901@monstr.eu> Message-ID: <1433838464.16887.53.camel@x220> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 10:08 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > So there is nothing to do? Or are there still cases that could be > interesting? See my reply to Michal. I think that, unless we come up with a new, much simpler way to add license info to modules, we're stuck with doing the boring checks this currently requires. And, of course, that new way, whatever that might be, can probably not just replace the many thousands instances of the MODULE_LICENSE() macro that there currently are. People being not to keen on seeing their code being, well, relicensed. Paul Bolle