From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:11:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver
In-Reply-To: <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
References: <1434547409-12232-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
 <1434611556.2385.8.camel@x220> <20150618093344.7d486e97@bbrezillon>
 <55827606.7020908@atmel.com> <1434614090.2385.19.camel@x220>
 <20150618125918.GC27492@piout.net>
Message-ID: <1434640312.2385.112.camel@x220>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Alexandre,

You know, I can't read Nicolas' mind, so I couldn't say from the patch
itself that it was not a silly mistake.

I also can't look into the future. I can however check lkml (at least
the few weeks of lkml I keep at hand) and see whether there's another
patch pending that would allow this driver to build.

Discussing those two disabilities doesn't require a (much broader)
discussion on how Atmel goes about their Linux business. At least, I
hope it doesn't, because I don't actually have an opinion in that
matter.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle