From: jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com (James Liao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:06:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435806379.3526.31.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGS+omBdz2df7ykYpx5Gh1B2Ym+XhpOPOOUu0a_qg7tJKqOy6A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:54 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > The problem is not that you use fixed clocks for non software
> > controllable clocks of unknwown rates, but that you try to use a single
> > clock for all of them and name it 'dummy' or 'null'. Name it
> >
> > dpi_ck {
> > compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > rate = <0>; /* unknown, generated by some Analog block */
> > };
>
> It would be nice, though, to use the real clock rates.
> Otherwise, we end up with a bunch of unknown clock rates, like this:
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate
> accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> clk_null 2 2 0
> 0 0
> mm_lvds_cts 0 0 0
> 0 0
> mm_lvds_pixel 0 0 0
> 0 0
> mm_dpi1_pixel 0 0 0
> 0 0
> Furthermore, at least some of these children clocks are possible
> source clocks for other clocks for which we do want to know the
> resulting frequency. For example, the "dmpll_*" clocks are mux inputs
> for many of the subsystem clocks.
These clocks such as clkph_mck_o are configured by other modules before
kernel init, and their rates may different among platforms. So we can't
use a hard-coded rate for them. And we also don't care the actual rate
of these clocks, so assign a dummy rate such as 0 to them should be a
better way.
Best regards,
james
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-18 5:29 [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null Eddie Huang
2015-06-18 16:15 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-19 11:36 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-06-22 3:38 ` James Liao
2015-06-22 12:53 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-24 7:54 ` James Liao
2015-06-24 10:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-06-30 9:07 ` James Liao
2015-07-01 6:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-01 11:54 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-02 3:06 ` James Liao [this message]
2015-07-02 4:23 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-03 7:45 ` James Liao
2015-07-03 8:38 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-02 2:05 ` James Liao
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 14:15 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-07 14:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-07 15:10 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-08 2:37 ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-08 5:44 ` Sascha Hauer
2015-07-10 7:27 ` Eddie Huang
2015-07-10 8:11 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-10 10:29 ` Eddie Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1435806379.3526.31.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox