From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:29:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example In-Reply-To: <1437114567-17629-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> References: <1437114567-17629-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> Message-ID: <1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model." So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic node name instead of using the chip's name. Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas --- Changes in v2: None Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow: Example: - max77686 at 09 { + max77686: pmic at 09 { compatible = "maxim,max77686"; interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>; interrupts = <26 0>; -- 2.4.3