From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:25:23 +0200 Subject: [RFC 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq PL Reset bindings. In-Reply-To: <1437691862-21312-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> References: <1437691862-21312-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437691862-21312-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> Message-ID: <1437722723.3834.3.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2015, 15:51 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer: > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ac4499e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl" > +- syscon <&slcr>; > +- #reset-cells: 1 > + > +Example: > + rstc: rstc at 240 { > + #reset-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"; > + syscon = <&slcr>; > + }; Instead of the syscon property, why not specify that the rstc node must be a child of the slcr node? regards Philipp