From: jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com (James Liao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:29:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438061398.17770.25.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24796517.2pfRdOOmRJ@ubix>
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 03:21 -0700, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> On Monday, July 27, 2015 10:56:22 AM James Liao wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:32 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > > @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
> > > >
> > > > #clock-cells = <0>;
> > > >
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > + cpum_ck: dummy_clk {
> > >
> > > I'm not a big fan of this "dummy_clk".
> > > The 'name' part of the devicetree node is supposed to be generic.
> > > So, perhaps just oscillator at 2, and move it down below clk32k:
> > > oscillator at 1.
> >
> > > Otherwise:
> > cpum_ck is a test clock which only available in IC test. It's empty on
> > MT8173 evaluation or production boards. Should we name this kind of
> > empty clock as an oscillator? Or is there a better name for it?
> >
>
> So if it will never be part of any available boards, why do you want to add
> it?
infra_cpum is a clock gate, and its clock comes from an external clock.
In previous versions we named the external clock as "clk_null", but it's
not accepted. A specified name is preferred even it's not available on
some boards. So I named it as cpum_ck in this patch.
Best regards,
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-24 3:01 [PATCH v4 0/7] Add Mediatek MT8173 subsystem clocks support James Liao
2015-07-24 3:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] clk: mediatek: Add fixed clocks support for Mediatek SoC James Liao
2015-07-24 11:33 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-28 5:10 ` James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] clk: mediatek: Fix rate and dependency of MT8173 clocks James Liao
2015-07-24 11:10 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-27 5:52 ` Sascha Hauer
[not found] ` <CAGS+omDjr6d9=+d-uphrENu3Kenr8QUc3VgbaWTd45wqWzi7tg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-27 7:52 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-07-28 5:19 ` James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] clk: mediatek: mt8173: Fix enabling of critical clocks James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document devicetree bindings for clock controllers James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] clk: mediatek: Add subsystem clocks of MT8173 James Liao
2015-07-24 11:18 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-28 2:14 ` James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] clk: mediatek: Add USB clock support in MT8173 APMIXEDSYS James Liao
2015-07-24 11:28 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-28 4:05 ` James Liao
2015-07-24 3:02 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes James Liao
2015-07-24 11:32 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-07-27 2:56 ` James Liao
2015-07-27 10:21 ` Matthias Brugger
2015-07-28 5:29 ` James Liao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438061398.17770.25.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox