From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:05:02 +0200 Subject: [RFCv2 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq Reset Controller bindings. In-Reply-To: <1437783682-13632-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> References: <1437783682-13632-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437783682-13632-2-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> Message-ID: <1438070702.3193.4.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:21 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer: > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ac4499e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl" > +- syscon <&slcr>; > +- #reset-cells: 1 > + > +Example: > + rstc: rstc at 240 { > + #reset-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"; > + syscon = <&slcr>; Why the syscon phandle if rstc always is the child of slcr? Why not just request the syscon for the rstc's parent node. > + }; regards Philipp