From: cburden@codeaurora.org (Cassidy Burden)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib: Make _find_next_bit helper function inline
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:09:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438110564-19932-1-git-send-email-cburden@codeaurora.org> (raw)
I've tested Yury Norov's find_bit reimplementation with the test_find_bit
module (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/8/141) and measured about 35-40%
performance degradation on arm64 3.18 run with fixed CPU frequency.
The performance degradation appears to be caused by the
helper function _find_next_bit. After inlining this function into
find_next_bit and find_next_zero_bit I get slightly better performance
than the old implementation:
find_next_zero_bit find_next_bit
old new inline old new inline
26 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
26 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
Signed-off-by: Cassidy Burden <cburden@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
lib/find_bit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/find_bit.c b/lib/find_bit.c
index 18072ea..d0e04f9 100644
--- a/lib/find_bit.c
+++ b/lib/find_bit.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
* find_next_zero_bit. The difference is the "invert" argument, which
* is XORed with each fetched word before searching it for one bits.
*/
-static unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+static inline unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
unsigned long nbits, unsigned long start, unsigned long invert)
{
unsigned long tmp;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-28 19:09 Cassidy Burden [this message]
2015-07-28 21:23 ` [PATCH] lib: Make _find_next_bit helper function inline Yury
2015-07-28 21:38 ` Yury
2015-07-28 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-29 13:30 ` Alexey Klimov
2015-07-29 20:40 ` Cassidy Burden
2015-08-23 22:53 ` Alexey Klimov
2015-08-29 15:15 ` Yury
2015-08-30 21:47 ` Rasmus Villemoes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438110564-19932-1-git-send-email-cburden@codeaurora.org \
--to=cburden@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).