From: alex.williamson@redhat.com (Alex Williamson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 14:09:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438978155.4023.263.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438622444-25444-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 19:20 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch adds the registration/unregistration of an
> irq_bypass_consumer on irqfd assignment/deassignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3 (Feng Wu):
> - Use kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start
> - Remove kvm_arch_irq_bypass_update
> - Add member 'struct irq_bypass_producer *producer' in
> 'struct kvm_kernel_irqfd', it is needed by posted interrupt.
> - Remove 'irq_bypass_unregister_consumer' in kvm_irqfd_deassign()
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - populate of kvm and gsi removed
> - unregister the consumer on irqfd_shutdown
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 2 ++
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> index f926b39..0c1de05 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd {
> struct list_head list;
> poll_table pt;
> struct work_struct shutdown;
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer;
> + struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
> };
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 647ffb8..08855de 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/seqlock.h>
> +#include <linux/irqbypass.h>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> #include <kvm/iodev.h>
> @@ -140,6 +141,7 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> /*
> * It is now safe to release the object's resources
> */
> + irq_bypass_unregister_consumer(&irqfd->consumer);
> eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
> kfree(irqfd);
> }
> @@ -380,6 +382,14 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args)
> */
> fdput(f);
>
> + irqfd->consumer.token = (void *)irqfd->eventfd;
> + irqfd->consumer.add_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer;
> + irqfd->consumer.del_producer = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer;
> + irqfd->consumer.stop = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop;
> + irqfd->consumer.start = kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start;
> + ret = irq_bypass_register_consumer(&irqfd->consumer);
> + WARN_ON(ret);
This seems like a lazy way to handle this error. What is the stack
trace from this WARN_ON going to tell us that we didn't already know?
If we get the WARN_ON, it's probably means that an incompatible producer
registered the token first. It means we can't do bypass, but it doesn't
tell us anything about whether bypass is or is not enabled. Wouldn't a
pr_info/debug() suffice for that? Thanks,
Alex
> +
> return 0;
>
> fail:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-07 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-03 17:20 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: irqfd consumer based on IRQ bypass manager Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: x86: select IRQ_BYPASS_MANAGER Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: " Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: create kvm_irqfd.h Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: introduce kvm_arch functions for IRQ bypass Eric Auger
2015-08-07 20:09 ` Alex Williamson
2015-08-10 8:43 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:20 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: eventfd: add irq bypass consumer management Eric Auger
2015-08-07 20:09 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2015-08-10 8:44 ` Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438978155.4023.263.camel@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).