linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: pgtable: use a single bit for PTE_WRITE regardless of DBM
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441992122-19888-4-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441992122-19888-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Depending on CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM, we use either bit 57 or 51 of the
pte to represent PTE_WRITE. Given that bit 51 is reserved prior to
ARMv8.1, we can just use that bit regardless of the config option. That
also matches what happens if a kernel configured with ARM64_HW_AFDBM=y
is run on a CPU without the DBM functionality.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 31df98adf005..b0329be95cb1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -26,13 +26,9 @@
  * Software defined PTE bits definition.
  */
 #define PTE_VALID		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
+#define PTE_WRITE		(PTE_DBM)		 /* same as DBM (51) */
 #define PTE_DIRTY		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 55)
 #define PTE_SPECIAL		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 56)
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM
-#define PTE_WRITE		(PTE_DBM)		 /* same as DBM */
-#else
-#define PTE_WRITE		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
-#endif
 #define PTE_PROT_NONE		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 58) /* only when !PTE_VALID */
 
 /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-11 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-11 17:21 [PATCH 0/3] arm64 fixes following support for hardware AF/DBM Catalin Marinas
2015-09-11 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Fix the pte_hw_dirty() check when AF/DBM is enabled Catalin Marinas
2015-09-11 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Fix pte_modify() to preserve the hardware dirty information Catalin Marinas
2015-09-11 17:22 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-09-11 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64 fixes following support for hardware AF/DBM Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441992122-19888-4-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).