From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: irqflags: Automatically identify I bit mis-management
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:26:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442237181-17064-8-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442237181-17064-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
This is self-test code to identify circumstances where the I bit is
set by hardware but no software exists to copy its state to the PMR.
I don't really expect this patch to be retained much after the RFC stage.
However I have included it in this RFC series to document the testing I
have done and to allow further testing under different workloads.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
index cf8a5184fce7..b2998b7946b6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/bug.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
@@ -94,6 +96,33 @@ static inline void maybe_switch_to_sysreg_gic_cpuif(void) {}
#else /* CONFIG_IRQFLAGS_GIC_MASKING */
+static inline void check_for_i_bit(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_USE_ICC_SYSREGS_FOR_IRQFLAGS
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* check whether the I-bit is spuriously enabled */
+ if (!in_nmi()) {
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+ "mov %0, #0",
+ "mrs %0, daif",
+ ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF)
+ : "=r" (flags));
+
+ WARN_ONCE(flags & PSR_I_BIT, "I bit is set: %08lx\n", flags);
+ }
+
+ /* check that the PMR has a legal value */
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+ "mov %0, #" __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED),
+ "mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1),
+ ARM64_HAS_SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF)
+ : "=r" (flags));
+ WARN_ONCE((flags & ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED) != ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED,
+ "ICC_PMR_EL1 has a bad value: %08lx\n", flags);
+#endif
+}
+
/*
* CPU interrupt mask handling.
*/
@@ -101,6 +130,7 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
{
unsigned long flags, masked = ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED;
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"mrs %0, daif // arch_local_irq_save\n"
"msr daifset, #2",
@@ -119,6 +149,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
{
unsigned long unmasked = ICC_PMR_EL1_UNMASKED;
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"msr daifclr, #2 // arch_local_irq_enable",
"msr_s " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1) ",%0",
@@ -132,6 +163,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
{
unsigned long masked = ICC_PMR_EL1_MASKED;
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"msr daifset, #2 // arch_local_irq_disable",
"msr_s " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1) ",%0",
@@ -148,6 +180,7 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"mrs %0, daif // arch_local_save_flags",
"mrs_s %0, " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1),
@@ -164,6 +197,7 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
*/
static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
{
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"msr daif, %0 // arch_local_irq_restore",
"msr_s " __stringify(ICC_PMR_EL1) ",%0",
@@ -175,6 +209,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
{
+ check_for_i_bit();
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
"and %0, %0, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
"nop",
--
2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-14 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 13:26 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Pseudo-NMI for arm64 using ICC_PMR_EL1 (GICv3) Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] irqchip: gic-v3: Reset BPR during initialization Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: Add support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Daniel Thompson
2015-09-16 13:05 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-16 15:51 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-16 16:24 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-17 13:25 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-17 14:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-17 15:28 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-17 15:43 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: irqflags: Reorder the fiq & async macros Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC sysregs to implement IRQ masking Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: Implement IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE using pseudo-NMIs Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2015-09-18 5:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Pseudo-NMI for arm64 using ICC_PMR_EL1 (GICv3) Jon Masters
2015-09-18 11:23 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-22 18:08 ` 答复: " Dingtianhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442237181-17064-8-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).