From: ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org (Ard Biesheuvel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64/efi: mark UEFI reserved regions as MEMBLOCK_NOMAP
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:55:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442246129-13930-4-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442246129-13930-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Change the EFI memory reservation logic to use memblock_mark_nomap()
rather than memblock_reserve() to mark UEFI reserved regions as
occupied. In addition to reserving them against allocations done by
memblock, this will also prevent them from being covered by the linear
mapping.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
index e8ca6eaedd02..f609325c4a83 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static __init void reserve_regions(void)
early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(paddr, size);
if (is_reserve_region(md)) {
- memblock_reserve(paddr, size);
+ memblock_mark_nomap(paddr, size);
if (uefi_debug)
pr_cont("*");
}
@@ -215,8 +215,6 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
efi_system_table = params.system_table;
- memblock_reserve(params.mmap & PAGE_MASK,
- PAGE_ALIGN(params.mmap_size + (params.mmap & ~PAGE_MASK)));
memmap.phys_map = (void *)params.mmap;
memmap.map = early_memremap(params.mmap, params.mmap_size);
memmap.map_end = memmap.map + params.mmap_size;
@@ -228,6 +226,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
reserve_regions();
early_memunmap(memmap.map, params.mmap_size);
+ memblock_mark_nomap(params.mmap, params.mmap_size);
}
static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
--
1.9.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-14 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 15:55 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: remove UEFI reserved regions from linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memblock: add MEMBLOCK_NOMAP attribute to memblock memory table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: only consider memblocks with NOMAP cleared for linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-14 15:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442246129-13930-4-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--to=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).