From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:03:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT In-Reply-To: <560310EA.2070805@intel.com> References: <1439417187-21411-1-git-send-email-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <1439417187-21411-3-git-send-email-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <1443033714.74600.18.camel@infradead.org> <560310EA.2070805@intel.com> Message-ID: <1443042212.74600.30.camel@infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 22:51 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > But if the device ID is assigned already, why would it hurt to > actually use it? It doesn't hurt at all, as long as we understand that there was no need to assign it a device ID at all, at least for Linux's benefit. And as long as it doesn't set a precedent that makes other people think they need to do so. -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5691 bytes Desc: not available URL: