From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: scottwood@freescale.com (Scott Wood)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:57:01 -0500
Subject: [PATCH V3 5/6] clk: qoriq: Add ls1043a support.
In-Reply-To: <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org>
References: <1444822498-16477-1-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com>
 <1444822498-16477-6-git-send-email-B48286@freescale.com>
 <20151014183113.GE26883@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <1444870621.5185.223.camel@freescale.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:31 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/14, Zhiqiang Hou wrote:
> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@freescale.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@freescale.com>
> > ---
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> 

Could you ack my clock patchset that this depends on (if there are no 

objections)?  Mike Turquette acked the RFC version a while back, but it's 

changed a bit since then (including the new clk_get_num_parents() and 

clk_get_parent_by_index() -- I CCed Russell King on that but got no 

response), and got no response when I asked whether the ack was still good 

for v3.

-Scott