From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:08:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output In-Reply-To: <20151028170116.GI4058@x1> References: <20151027172428.GB21070@earth> <20151027181555.GE5828@x1> <1445971482.2757.27.camel@perches.com> <20151028082446.GF5828@x1> <56309419.4060908@samsung.com> <20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de> <20151028095524.GP5828@x1> <5630CA06.7050503@samsung.com> <1446050506.2757.109.camel@perches.com> <20151028170116.GI4058@x1> Message-ID: <1446052121.2757.120.camel@perches.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:01 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Reviewer output currently does not include the subsystem > > that matched. Add it. > > > > Miscellanea: > > > > o Add a get_subsystem_name routine to centralize this > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches > > --- > > scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > It looks like I'm going to have to drop the patch where we actually > start using the R: tag properly due to some social, emotional issues. Not to mention logical. > Despite that and not knowing Perl, I believe get_maintainer.pl should > be printing out the subsystem next to 'reviewer' as it does for > 'maintainer'. > > So with that in mind: > Acked-by: Lee Jones It'd be better if you could add a "tested-by:" instead.