From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: yong.wu@mediatek.com (Yong Wu)
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:58:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT
In-Reply-To: <20151023092636.GX27420@8bytes.org>
References: <1444357388-30257-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com>
 <20151014125620.GQ27420@8bytes.org> <1445488802.27202.67.camel@mhfsdcap03>
 <20151023092636.GX27420@8bytes.org>
Message-ID: <1448344693.13079.6.camel@mhfsdcap03>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> >      But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu
> > has called a function of the mtk-smi).
> >      So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them?
> 
> I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and
> Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s).
> 
> 
> 	Joerg
> 
Hi Joerg,

   About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer.
MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer.
>>From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the
drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer.
And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer.

Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others?

By the way, I will send the next version after Robin reposting
Short-descriptor. maybe in next week.