From: yong.wu@mediatek.com (Yong Wu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:30:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448415054.13079.9.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151124103819.GE17658@ulmo.nvidia.com>
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu
> > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi).
> > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them?
> > >
> > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and
> > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s).
> > >
> > >
> > > Joerg
> > >
> > Hi Joerg,
> >
> > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer.
> > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer.
> > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the
> > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer.
> > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer.
> >
> > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others?
>
> Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to
> be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of
> a common ground to instate a framework.
>
> Thierry
Got it.
Thanks very much for your reply.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-09 2:23 [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT Yong Wu
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: iommu: Add binding for mediatek IOMMU Yong Wu
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: mediatek: Add smi dts binding Yong Wu
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] iommu: add ARM short descriptor page table allocator Yong Wu
2015-10-14 12:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-15 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-06 8:42 ` Yong Wu
2015-11-06 11:42 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] memory: mediatek: Add SMI driver Yong Wu
2015-10-27 13:24 ` Robin Murphy
2015-10-31 8:32 ` Yong Wu
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8173 IOMMU driver Yong Wu
2015-10-14 12:53 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-26 5:23 ` Yong Wu
2015-10-27 13:25 ` Robin Murphy
2015-10-31 8:28 ` Yong Wu
2015-10-09 2:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] dts: mt8173: Add iommu/smi nodes for mt8173 Yong Wu
2015-10-14 12:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT Joerg Roedel
2015-10-22 4:40 ` Yong Wu
2015-10-23 9:26 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-11-24 5:58 ` Yong Wu
2015-11-24 10:38 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-25 1:30 ` Yong Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1448415054.13079.9.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox