linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 7/4] arm64: when walking onto the task stack, check sp & fp are in current->stack
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:22:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449742961-11432-3-git-send-email-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449742961-11432-1-git-send-email-james.morse@arm.com>

When unwind_frame() reaches the bottom of the irq_stack, the last fp
points to the original task stack. unwind_frame() uses
IRQ_STACK_TO_TASK_STACK() to find the sp value. If either values is
wrong, we may end up walking a corrupt stack.

Check these values are sane by testing if they are both on the stack
pointed to by current->stack.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b947eeffa5b2..d916d5b6aef6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -71,9 +71,17 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
 	 * to task stack.
 	 * If we reach the end of the stack - and its an interrupt stack,
 	 * read the original task stack pointer from the dummy frame.
+	 *
+	 * Check the frame->fp we read from the bottom of the irq_stack,
+	 * and the original task stack pointer are both in current->stack.
 	 */
-	if (frame->sp == irq_stack_ptr)
-		frame->sp = IRQ_STACK_TO_TASK_STACK(irq_stack_ptr);
+	if (frame->sp == irq_stack_ptr) {
+		unsigned long orig_sp = IRQ_STACK_TO_TASK_STACK(irq_stack_ptr);
+
+		if(object_is_on_stack((void *)orig_sp) &&
+		   object_is_on_stack((void *)frame->fp))
+			frame->sp = orig_sp;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.6.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-04 11:02 [PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Add support for IRQ stack James Morse
2015-12-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] arm64: Store struct task_info in sp_el0 James Morse
2015-12-04 13:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-04 14:55     ` James Morse
2015-12-04 16:18       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-06 13:15     ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack James Morse
2015-12-04 12:21   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-04 14:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Add do_softirq_own_stack() and enable irq_stacks James Morse
2015-12-04 13:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-04 13:47     ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-07 22:48   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-08 11:43     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 16:02       ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-08 17:23         ` James Morse
2015-12-08 17:27           ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 23:13           ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-09  9:47           ` James Morse
2015-12-09 11:38             ` Will Deacon
2015-12-09 13:45   ` Will Deacon
2015-12-09 14:36     ` James Morse
2015-12-04 11:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] arm64: switch to irq_stack during softirq James Morse
2015-12-04 14:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-04 14:39     ` James Morse
2015-12-04 18:40       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-08 10:29         ` James Morse
2015-12-06 13:51       ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-04 12:17 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] arm64: Add support for IRQ stack Jungseok Lee
2015-12-06 13:56   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-04 13:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-06 13:33   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-10 10:22 ` [PATCH v8 5/4] arm64: Fix off-by-one in stack tracing when stepping off irq stack James Morse
2015-12-10 10:22   ` [PATCH v8 6/4] arm64: Add this_cpu_ptr() assembler macro for use in entry.S James Morse
2015-12-10 10:22   ` James Morse [this message]
2015-12-10 10:22   ` [PATCH v8 8/4] arm64: don't call C code with el0's fp register James Morse
2015-12-10 14:03   ` [PATCH v8 5/4] arm64: Fix off-by-one in stack tracing when stepping off irq stack Jungseok Lee
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH v8 9/4] arm64: reduce stack use in irq_handler James Morse
2015-12-18 16:01 ` [PATCH v8 9/4] arm64: remove irq_count and do_softirq_own_stack() James Morse
2015-12-20 11:07   ` Jungseok Lee
2015-12-21 11:30     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-21 12:19       ` James Morse
2015-12-21 12:21         ` Will Deacon
2015-12-21 14:06           ` Jungseok Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1449742961-11432-3-git-send-email-james.morse@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).