[RFC 3/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver

Daniel Kurtz
2016-02-02T16:21:54Z

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 18:22 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 12:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 21:15 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 16:42 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> >> > > >> > Hi Dan,
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > Many thanks for your comments and time.
>> >> > > >> > I reply my plan inline.
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 12:49 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
>> >> > > >> >> Hi HS,
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> Sorry for the delay. It is hard to find time to review a >3700 line
>> >> > > >> >> driver :-o in detail....
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> Some review comments inline, although I still do not completely
>> >> > > >> >> understand how all that this driver does and how it works.
>> >> > > >> >> I'll try to find time to go through this driver in detail again next
>> >> > > >> >> time you post it for review.
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:14 PM, <hs.liao@mediatek.com> wrote:
>> >> > > >> >> > From: HS Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com>
>> >> > > >> >> >
>> >> > > >> >> > This patch is first version of Mediatek Command Queue(CMDQ) driver. The
>> >> > > >> >> > CMDQ is used to help read/write registers with critical time limitation,
>> >> > > >> >> > such as updating display configuration during the vblank. It controls
>> >> > > >> >> > Global Command Engine (GCE) hardware to achieve this requirement.
>> >> > > >> >> > Currently, CMDQ only supports display related hardwares, but we expect
>> >> > > >> >> > it can be extended to other hardwares for future requirements.
>> >> > > >> >> >
>> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: HS Liao <hs.liao@mediatek.com>
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> [snip]
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c
>> >> > > >> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> > > >> >> > index 0000000..7570f00
>> >> > > >> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> > > >> >> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > [snip]
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> >> > +static const struct cmdq_subsys g_subsys[] = {
>> >> > > >> >> > + {0x1400, 1, "MMSYS"},
>> >> > > >> >> > + {0x1401, 2, "DISP"},
>> >> > > >> >> > + {0x1402, 3, "DISP"},
>> >> > > >> >>
>> >> > > >> >> This isn't going to scale. These addresses could be different on
>> >> > > >> >> different chips.
>> >> > > >> >> Instead of a static table like this, we probably need specify to the
>> >> > > >> >> connection between gce and other devices via devicetree phandles, and
>> >> > > >> >> then use the phandles to lookup the corresponding device address
>> >> > > >> >> range.
>> >> > > >> >
>> >> > > >> > I will define them in device tree.
>> >> > > >> > E.g.
>> >> > > >> > cmdq {
>> >> > > >> > reg_domain = 0x14000000, 0x14010000, 0x14020000
>> >> > > >> > }
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> The devicetree should only model hardware relationships, not software
>> >> > > >> considerations.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Is the hardware constraint here for using gce with various other
>> >> > > >> hardware blocks? I think we already model this by only providing a
>> >> > > >> gce phandle in the device tree nodes for those devices that can use
>> >> > > >> gce.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Looking at the driver closer, as far as I can tell, the whole subsys
>> >> > > >> concept is a purely software abstraction, and only used to debug the
>> >> > > >> CMDQ_CODE_WRITE command. In fact, AFAICT, everything would work fine
>> >> > > >> if we just completely removed the 'subsys' concept, and just passed
>> >> > > >> through the raw address provided by the driver.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> So, I recommend just removing 'subsys' completely from the driver -
>> >> > > >> from this array, and in the masks.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Instead, if there is an error on the write command, just print the
>> >> > > >> address that fails. There are other ways to deduce the subsystem from
>> >> > > >> a physical address.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Thanks,
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> -Dan
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Hi Dan,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Subsys is not just for debug.
>> >> > > > Its main purpose is to transfer CPU address to GCE address.
>> >> > > > Let me explain it by "write" op,
>> >> > > > I list a code segment from cmdq_rec_append_command().
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > case CMDQ_CODE_WRITE:
>> >> > > > subsys = cmdq_subsys_from_phys_addr(cqctx, arg_a);
>> >> > > > if (subsys < 0) {
>> >> > > > dev_err(dev,
>> >> > > > "unsupported memory base address 0x%08x\n",
>> >> > > > arg_a);
>> >> > > > return -EFAULT;
>> >> > > > }
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > *cmd_ptr++ = arg_b;
>> >> > > > *cmd_ptr++ = (CMDQ_CODE_WRITE << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT) |
>> >> > > > (arg_a & CMDQ_ARG_A_WRITE_MASK) |
>> >> > > > ((subsys & CMDQ_SUBSYS_MASK) << CMDQ_SUBSYS_SHIFT);
>> >> > > > break;
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Subsys is mapped from physical address via cmdq_subsys_from_phys_addr(),
>> >> > > > and then it becomes part of GCE command via ((subsys & CMDQ_SUBSYS_MASK)
>> >> > > > << CMDQ_SUBSYS_SHIFT) .
>> >> > > > Only low bits of physical address are the same as GCE address.
>> >> > > > We can get it by (arg_a & CMDQ_ARG_A_WRITE_MASK).
>> >> > > > MASK is used to define how many bits are valid for this op.
>> >> > > > So, GCE address = subsys + valid low bits.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > How are these upper bits of the "GCE address" defined?
>> >> > > In other words, for a given SoC, how is the mapping between physical
>> >> > > io addresses to GCE addresses defined?
>> >> > > Is this mapping fixed by hardware?
>> >>
>> >> Please answer the detailed technical questions:
>> >>
>> >> How are these upper bits of the "GCE address" defined?
>> >
>> > A GCE command is arg_a + arg_b. Both of them have 32 bits length.
>> > arg_a is op + subsys + addr, and arg_b is value.
>> > subsys + addr is less than 32bits, so we need to map address range to
>> > subsys.
>> > The mapping rule is defined by hardware.
>> >
>> >> In other words, for a given SoC, how is the mapping between physical
>> >> io addresses to GCE addresses defined?
>> >
>> > It is (b).
>> >
>> >>
>> >> (a) Does the GCE remap a continuous device IO address range?
>> >>
>> >> AFAICT, the defines an MT8173 specific mapping of:
>> >>
>> >> For example, the g_subsys table above seems to imply that the MT8173
>> >> gce maps all of:
>> >> 0x1400ffff:0x141fffff => 0x010000:0x1fffff
>> >>
>> >> (b) Or, are the upper 5 bits of the "gce address" significant, and via
>> >> hardware it can map a disjoint groups of device addresses into the
>> >> continuous GCE address space, and really there are 0x1f distinct 64k
>> >> mappings:
>> >>
>> >> mmsys (1) : 0x14000000:0x1400ffff => 0x010000:0x01ffff
>> >> disp (2) : 0x14010000:0x1401ffff => 0x020000:0x02ffff
>> >> disp (3) : 0x14020000:0x1402ffff => 0x030000:0x03ffff
>> >> ...
>> >> ???? (1f) : 0x141fffff:0x141fffff => 0x1f0000:0x1fffff
>> >>
>> >> If the mapping is fixed and continuous (a), then I think all we need
>> >> is a single dts entry for the gce node that describes how it performs
>> >> this mapping. And then, the gce consumers can just pass in their
>> >> regular physical addresses, and the gce driver can remap them directly
>> >> to gce addresses.
>> >>
>> >> WDYT?
>> >
>> > How about this?
>> > hardware_module = <address_base subsys_id mask>;
>> > So, the result is
>> > mmsys_config_base = <0x14000000 1 0xffff0000>;
>> > disp_rdma_config_base = <0x14010000 2 0xffff0000>;
>> > disp_mutex_config_base = <0x14020000 3 0xffff0000>;
>>
>> What uses ID 0 and 4 - 0x1f?
>
> Subsys is defined by GCE hardware, and other IDs are reserved currently.
>
>> According to mt8173.dtsi, here are the blocks in the address ranges above:
>>
>> @1400:
>> mmsys: clock-controller at 14000000
>> ovl0: ovl at 1400c000
>> ovl1: ovl at 1400d000
>> rdma0: rdma at 1400e000
>> rdma1: rdma at 1400f000
>>
>> @1401:
>> rdma2: rdma at 14010000
>> wdma0: wdma at 14011000
>> wdma1: wdma at 14012000
>> color0: color at 14013000
>> color1: color at 14014000
>> aal at 14015000
>> gamma at 14016000
>> merge at 14017000
>> split0: split at 14018000
>> split1: split at 14019000
>> ufoe at 1401a000
>> dsi0: dsi at 1401b000
>> dsi1: dsi at 1401c000
>> dpi0: dpi at 1401d000
>> pwm0: pwm at 1401e000
>> pwm1: pwm at 1401f000
>>
>> @1402:
>> mutex: mutex at 14020000
>> od at 14023000
>> larb0: larb at 14021000
>> smi_common: smi at 14022000
>> hdmi0: hdmi at 14025000
>> larb4: larb at 14027000
>>
>> I assume that the gce will work with any of the devices in those
>> ranges, not just "mmsys", "rdma" and "mutex", right? (Also, notice
>
> That's right.
>
>> there are two "rdma" in the @1400 range, so rdma is really not a good
>> name for @1401)
>
> I think we can just use index.
> disp0_config_base = <0x14000000 1 0xffff0000>;
> disp1_config_base = <0x14010000 2 0xffff0000>;
> disp2_config_base = <0x14020000 3 0xffff0000>;
>
>> Further, it looks like the gce just maps a large device address range
>> starting at 0x14000000 to (21-bit) gce address 0x010000, rather than
>> 31 individually addressable 64k "subsys" blocks. Is there a counter
>> example that I am missing?
>
> From GCE's point of view,
> it's 32 (0x0~0x1f) individually addressable 64k "subsys" blocks.
> Currently, we don't have a counter example since all display related
> address are put together.

Ok, in this case, perhaps we should treat the GCE like an IOMMU, and
have its binding define 32 slots or channels.
Then, any device that wishes to send the GCE commands for its address
range should register a phandle to the gce, including the
corresponding slot.

For example:

include/.../gce.h
include/dt-bindings/../mediatek-gce.h
#define GCE_SLOT_1 1
...

arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi:

&ovl0: {
mediatek,gce = <&gce GCE_SLOT_1>;
};

&ovl1: {
mediatek,gce = <&gce GCE_SLOT_1>;
};

&rdma2: {
mediatek,gce = <&gce GCE_SLOT_2>;
};

&mutex: {
mediatek,gce = <&gce GCE_SLOT_3>;
};

&od: {
mediatek,gce = <&gce GCE_SLOT_3>;
};

Then, as each platform driver is probed, it can use the phandle to
look up its corresponding gce slot instance, retrieving an (opaque)
pointer to a struct gce_slot.
The gce driver can have a set of constant tables matching the slots to
address ranges for particular per-soc compatibles, one of which is
loaded on probe.
Later, when the device (gce consumer) wants to send a gce write
command, it passes in the gce_slot as an argument, and the gce driver
can do the corresponding lookup of subsys value and mask out the
provided *device virtual* address. In this way, you also no longer
need to convert the devices iomap'ed addresses into physical addresses
before passing them to the gce.

WDYT?

-Dan