From: menghui.lin@mediatek.com (menghui lin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 10:42:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454553763.24913.8.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160203122952.GF4455@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 12:29 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 01:39:02PM +0800, menghui lin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 19:38 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > How does the driver know if it needs to change the mode (ie, how can it
> > > tell if the current mode is inadequate) and surely if we can only change
> > > in one direction this isn't terribly useful?
>
> > I think the datasheet of buck/ldo could provide information about power
> > capability of each mode. The driver should adjust regulator mode per its
> > device's power requirement.
>
> That's of no help for a consumer driver which doesn't know what
> regulator is supplying it.
>
> > case 1:
>
> > We have a USB typeC micro-controller, which has two modes - standby and
> > normal. It requires 1.8V and 3.3V to operate (both powers are always
> > on). The device stays in standby mode when there is no cable in. When
> > cable in, we got an interrupt and change device into normal mode.
>
> > The standby mode power consumption is quite small, so we would like the
> > change mode of regulator into STANDBY to save more power. And we change
> > into NORMAL when we receive cable-in interrupt.
>
> This seems like something that we ought to be doing via runtime PM
> anyway which should be going through the suspend mode bindings, though
> that would need some plumbing in.
>
> > case 2:
>
> > About buck regulator for CPU, it usually provides PWM mode, PWM/PFM Auto
> > mode, PFM mode. I think it could map to FAST, NORMAL, IDLE mode
> > respectively. Most of time we would use just normal mode. However, we
> > would change regulator into PWM mode time to time to test buck output
> > performance on the tested board.
>
> That's a test use that doesn't seem a good fit for upstream at all.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your response.
It seems more work is required for dynamic mode switch.
For MT6323 regulator patch, we would remove mode-switch related code for
now to provide basic regulator support first.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-04 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 12:00 [PATCH V4 1/2] regulator: Add document for MT6323 regulator John Crispin
2016-01-27 12:00 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support " John Crispin
2016-01-27 14:41 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-28 7:16 ` Henry Chen
2016-01-28 11:38 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-28 18:13 ` John Crispin
2016-01-28 23:13 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-29 9:52 ` menghui lin
2016-01-29 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-29 12:11 ` menghui lin
2016-02-02 19:38 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-03 5:39 ` menghui lin
2016-02-03 12:29 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-04 2:42 ` menghui lin [this message]
2016-02-02 19:39 ` Mark Brown
2016-02-08 12:14 ` kbuild test robot
2016-02-01 15:40 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] regulator: Add document " Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454553763.24913.8.camel@mtksdaap41 \
--to=menghui.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox