From: yang.shi@linaro.org (Yang Shi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:53:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455227590-9837-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> (raw)
Switching between stacks is only valid if we are tracing ourselves while on the
irq_stack, so it is only valid when in current and non-preemptible context,
otherwise is is just zeroed off.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 13 ++++++-------
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 12a18cb..d9751a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -44,14 +44,13 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
/*
- * Use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid false-positives from
- * CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. get_wchan() calls unwind_frame() on sleeping
- * task stacks, we can be pre-empted in this case, so
- * {raw_,}smp_processor_id() may give us the wrong value. Sleeping
- * tasks can't ever be on an interrupt stack, so regardless of cpu,
- * the checks will always fail.
+ * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
+ * non-preemptible context.
*/
- irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(raw_smp_processor_id());
+ if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
+ irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+ else
+ irq_stack_ptr = 0;
low = frame->sp;
/* irq stacks are not THREAD_SIZE aligned */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index cbedd72..7d8db3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -146,9 +146,18 @@ static void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct stackframe frame;
- unsigned long irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+ unsigned long irq_stack_ptr;
int skip;
+ /*
+ * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
+ * non-preemptible context.
+ */
+ if (tsk == current && !preemptible())
+ irq_stack_ptr = IRQ_STACK_PTR(smp_processor_id());
+ else
+ irq_stack_ptr = 0;
+
pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
if (!tsk)
--
2.0.2
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 21:53 Yang Shi [this message]
2016-02-12 13:47 ` [PATCH] arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust James Morse
2016-02-12 17:38 ` Shi, Yang
2016-02-12 17:41 ` Will Deacon
2016-02-12 17:43 ` Shi, Yang
2016-02-12 17:54 ` Shi, Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455227590-9837-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org \
--to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).