From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@baker-net.org.uk (Adam Baker) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:25:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2] A driver for the hardware monitoring chip in the Zyxel NSA320 Message-ID: <1455578705-10531-1-git-send-email-linux@baker-net.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org This patch series adds a driver to support the hardware monitoring MCU that is present in the Zyxel NSA320. It is believed that this is identical to the one used in the NSA325 and some variants of the NSA310. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/nsa320-mcu.txt | 21 ++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/kirkwood-nsa320.dts | 13 ++++- drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 15 ++++++ drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 + drivers/hwmon/nsa320-hwmon.c | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Changes since v1 Update to reflect review comments from Guenter Roeck, mainly changing it to be nsa320, not nsa3xx but also making it return an errno on failure and various other tidy ups. I'm not sure what protocol is with regard to adding tags to a patch when updating it, in v1 patch 1 received Acked-by: Rob Herring patch 2 was reviewed by Guenter Roeck but does the reviewed by tag only get added if he agrees with the changes? Sebastian Hesselbarth reviewed an early draft before it was posted publicly.