From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:19:08 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator handling Message-ID: <1455819551-4666-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On a recent patch series to build a PMIC chip as a module [0], Krzysztof asked me to check if all the consumer drivers, using the resources that this PMIC provides, already support probe deferral. While investigating that, I noticed that the Exynos TMU didn't do it so this series fix that bug and other two minor issues that I noticed while reviewing the driver and its DT binding. The series are on top of Krzysztof's patches [1,2,3] not because there's a dependency but to avoid merge conflicts with in-flight patches. Please let me know if you prefer to use a different base instead. [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/11/857 [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345791/ [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345741/ [3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345701/ Best regards, Javier Javier Martinez Canillas (3): thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional property in DT binding thermal: exynos: Use devm_regulator_get_optional() for vtmu thermal: exynos: Defer probe if vtmu is present but not registered Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++--- drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0