From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: juno/vexpress: fix node name unit-address presence warnings
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:32:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458297136.2812.7.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJeeZ58at95gSRwOMnce_DjDsXVRYH_bMKaX=uDHtZAAA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 16:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> > Commit fa38a82096a1 ("scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version
> > 53bf130b1cdd") added warnings on node name unit-address presence/absence
> > mismatch in device trees.
> >
> > This patch fixes those warning on all the juno/vexpress platforms where
> > unit-address is present in node name while the reg/ranges property is
> > not present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi | 14 +++++-----
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-motherboard.dtsi | 30 +++++++++++-----------
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-aemv8a.dts | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/rtsm_ve-motherboard.dtsi | 14 +++++-----
> > .../boot/dts/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts | 10 ++++----
> > 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I am not sure if the intention of commit fa38a82096a1 is to fix even
> > existing warnings or not. I saw warning with today's -next branch.
>
> Yes. I'm dropping it for 4.6 though.
>
> > Let me know.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
> > index 9314f3943269..ba03c934a861 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dtsi
> > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
> > <0 63 4>;
> > };
> >
> > - smb {
> > + smb at 0,08000000 {
>
> Drop the comma and leading zeros. Comma is for distinct fields like
> bus,dev,func on PCI.
So what is the correct way of representing 2 cell addresses? Not just
those that are logically 64-bit addresses, (which I guess could be just
a single number), but things like vexpress motherboard where we have
Chip-select and Offset values?
I looked at ePAPR but it just says 'The unit-address must
match the first address specified in the reg property of the node.' and
lists valid characters for unit address, which includes ,._+-
--
Tixy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 12:12 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: juno/vexpress: fix node name unit-address presence warnings Sudeep Holla
2016-03-07 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: vexpress: " Sudeep Holla
2016-03-17 21:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: juno/vexpress: " Rob Herring
2016-03-18 10:32 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2016-03-18 13:09 ` Rob Herring
2016-03-18 14:15 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-03-18 14:52 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458297136.2812.7.camel@linaro.org \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).