From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: slemieux.tyco@gmail.com (Sylvain Lemieux) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:42:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH for v4.7] arm: lpc32xx: remove leftovers of legacy clock source and provider drivers In-Reply-To: <1456973180-31764-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> References: <1456973180-31764-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> Message-ID: <1459784558.25564.6.camel@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Vladimir, On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 04:46 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > After switching the platform to common clock framework there is no > more need to keep dead code in arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx, which glued > legacy clock source and clock provider drivers, remove the leftovers. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy > --- > arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.c | 95 ------------------------------------------ > arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h | 23 +--------- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 117 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h > index 1cd8853..f03683f 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/common.h > @@ -19,38 +19,17 @@ > > #include > It is possible to remove "reboot.h"; do you want me to send a separate patch for it? > extern void lpc23xx_restart(enum reboot_mode, const char *); > The patch does not apply on 4.6-rc1; can you send a version 2 of your patch based on the latest mainline? Sylvain