From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 00:10:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145ddb99-025b-4ed0-bee6-e1e2c70ff0bf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401204425.904001-7-seanjc@google.com>
Hello Sean,
On 4/2/2025 2:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> index 51e38f5f4701..80d90d1dc24d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,26 @@ void add_wait_queue_priority(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_wait_queue_priority);
>
> +int add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head,
> + struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> +{
> + struct list_head *head = &wq_head->head;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int r = 0;
> +
> + wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&wq_head->lock, flags);
nit.
Using "guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&wq_head->lock)" can help you get rid of
both "flags" and "r".
> + if (!list_empty(head) &&
> + (list_first_entry(head, typeof(*wq_entry), entry)->flags & WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY))
> + r = -EBUSY;
> + else
> + list_add(&wq_entry->entry, head);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq_head->lock, flags);
> +
> + return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive);
> +
> void remove_wait_queue(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 20:44 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: Make irqfd registration globally unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: Use a local struct to do the initial vfs_poll() on an irqfd Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: Acquire SCRU lock outside of irqfds.lock during assignment Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: Initialize irqfd waitqueue callback when adding to the queue Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: Add irqfd to KVM's list via the vfs_poll() callback Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: Add irqfd to eventfd's waitqueue while holding irqfds.lock Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters Sean Christopherson
2025-04-02 18:40 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: Disallow binding multiple irqfds to an eventfd with a priority waiter Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: Drop sanity check that per-VM list of irqfds is unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Assert that eventfd() succeeds in Xen shinfo test Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add utilities to create eventfds and do KVM_IRQFD Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftests: Add a KVM_IRQFD test to verify uniqueness requirements Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145ddb99-025b-4ed0-bee6-e1e2c70ff0bf@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).