From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 5/5] efi/runtime-wrappers: remove ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK ifdef
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:46:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461591994-14918-6-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461591994-14918-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Now that arm, arm64, and x86 all provide ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK, we can
get rid of the trivial and now unused implementation of
efi_call_virt_check_flags.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: linux-efi at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
index 1f0277e..a51b2c3 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
@@ -22,10 +22,6 @@
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include <asm/efi.h>
-/*
- * Temporary scaffolding until all users provide ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK.
- */
-#ifdef ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK
static void efi_call_virt_check_flags(unsigned long flags, const char *call)
{
unsigned long cur_flags;
@@ -42,9 +38,6 @@ static void efi_call_virt_check_flags(unsigned long flags, const char *call)
flags, cur_flags, call);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
-#else /* ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK */
-static inline void efi_call_virt_check_flags(unsigned long flags, const char *call) {}
-#endif /* ARCH_EFI_IRQ_FLAGS_MASK */
#define efi_call_virt(f, args...) \
({ \
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 13:46 [PATCHv3 0/5] efi: detect erroneous firmware IRQ manipulation Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 13:46 ` [PATCHv3 1/5] efi/runtime-wrappers: detect FW irq flag corruption Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 14:12 ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 14:15 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-25 14:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-04-25 14:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-25 14:27 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 15:59 ` Matt Fleming
2016-04-25 16:03 ` Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 14:33 ` Robin Murphy
2016-04-25 13:46 ` [PATCHv3 2/5] arm64/efi: enable runtime call flag checking Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-25 13:46 ` [PATCHv3 3/5] arm/efi: " Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 13:46 ` [PATCHv3 4/5] x86/efi: " Mark Rutland
2016-04-25 13:46 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-04-25 16:03 ` [PATCHv3 0/5] efi: detect erroneous firmware IRQ manipulation Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461591994-14918-6-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).