From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 10:26:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] reset: lpc18xx: use devm_reset_controller_register()
In-Reply-To: <1462099023-11819-4-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
References: <1462099023-11819-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
 <1462099023-11819-4-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Message-ID: <1462177581.3933.7.camel@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Am Sonntag, den 01.05.2016, 19:36 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> Use devm_reset_controller_register() for the reset controller
> registration and remove the unregister call from the .remove callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> index 3b8a4f5..dd4f27e 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_rgu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rc);
>  
> -	ret = reset_controller_register(&rc->rcdev);
> +	ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &rc->rcdev);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register device\n");
>  		goto dis_clks;
> @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ static int lpc18xx_rgu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to unregister restart handler\n");
>  
> -	reset_controller_unregister(&rc->rcdev);
> -
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(rc->clk_delay);
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(rc->clk_reg);
>  

Hmm, would this patch theoretically allow a window between the calls to
clk_disable_unprepare(clk_reg) and devm_reset_controller_release() where
reset_control_get() + reset_control_(de)assert() would access unclocked
registers?

regards
Philipp