linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Make arch_randomize_brk avoid stack area
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 12:51:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462535460.4575.3.camel@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160506111937.GK20671@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:19 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Tixy,
> 
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:09:54PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > Note, in practice, since commit d1fd836dcf00 ("mm: split ET_DYN ASLR
> > from mmap ASLR") this problem shouldn't occur because the address chosen
> > for loading binaries is well clear of the stack, however, prior to that
> > the problem does occur because of the following...
> 
> [...]
> 
> > These changes have been tested on Linux v4.6-rc4 using 100000
> > invocations of a program [1] that can display the offset of a process's
> > brk...
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0 and earlier
> 
> I don't fully understand what we are supposed to do with this patch.
> Should it only be applied to stable kernels prior to 4.0? Do we need it
> in mainline? As you stated above, this problem does not exist in recent
> kernels.

Well, if you think it's worthwhile defensive programming against future
changes to elf loader, then it could go into latest kernels. Otherwise,
then yes, it's for Linux 4.0 and earlier. What's the process for that,
email it to stable at vger.kernel.org direct? Is that OK without an Ack
from an arm64 maintainer?

-- 
Tixy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-28 13:03 [RFC PATCH] arm64: Make arch_randomize_brk avoid stack area Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-04-28 14:17 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-05-02 19:34   ` Kees Cook
2016-05-03 11:13     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-05-03 17:26       ` Kees Cook
2016-05-04 14:09 ` [PATCH] " Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2016-05-04 17:20   ` Kees Cook
2016-05-06 11:19   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-05-06 11:51     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2016-05-10 15:55       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462535460.4575.3.camel@linaro.org \
    --to=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).