From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (Zhen Lei) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:08:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block In-Reply-To: <1465286898-13828-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <1465286898-13828-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Message-ID: <1465286898-13828-4-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) { int ret; + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) { + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid); + return -EINVAL; + } + ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid); if (ret < 0) { pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n", -- 2.5.0