From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:35:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v10 2/4] tee: generic TEE subsystem In-Reply-To: <20160607105015.GA18132@ermac> References: <1464784888-19854-1-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> <1464784888-19854-3-git-send-email-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> <5755EECA.6040606@ti.com> <20160607105015.GA18132@ermac> Message-ID: <1465310156.25087.19.camel@perches.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 12:50 +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:44:42PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > > On 06/01/2016 07:41 AM, Jens Wiklander wrote: > > few minor comments below. > > > > I see the patch generated (with --strict): > > > > > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > > > #512: FILE: drivers/tee/tee.c:375: > > > +static int tee_ioctl_close_session(struct tee_context *ctx, > > > +??????????????struct tee_ioctl_close_session_arg __user *uarg) > > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > > > #1607: FILE: drivers/tee/tee_shm_pool.c:103: > > > +struct tee_shm_pool *tee_shm_pool_alloc_res_mem(struct device *dev, > > > +??????????????????????struct tee_shm_pool_mem_info *priv_info, > > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis > The alternative is to format it as: > struct tee_shm_pool *tee_shm_pool_alloc_res_mem(struct device *dev, > ????????????????????????????????????????????????struct tee_shm_pool_mem_info > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*priv_info, > ????????????????????????????????????????????????struct tee_shm_pool_mem_info > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*dmabuf_info) > But that is a bit awkward. I'd like to keep it as it is if you don't mind. another style uses a separate line for the return type struct tee_shm_pool * tee_shm_pool_alloc_res_mem(struct device *dev, ? ?struct tee_shm_pool_mem_info *priv_info, ? ?struct tee_shm_pool_mem_info *dmabuf_info)