From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk (Ben Dooks) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:20:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: make unexported functions static Message-ID: <1465402842-26798-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org There are three functions that do not get exported from the psci_smp.c file that if we make static then the following warnings get squashed: arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:74:6: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c:86:5: warning: symbol 'psci_cpu_kill' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Cc: Russell King --- arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c index cb3fcae..20d6343 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int psci_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU -int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) +static int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) { /* Fail early if we don't have CPU_OFF support */ if (!psci_ops.cpu_off) @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int psci_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } -void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) +static void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) { u32 state = PSCI_POWER_STATE_TYPE_POWER_DOWN << PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_SHIFT; @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void psci_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu) panic("psci: cpu %d failed to shutdown\n", cpu); } -int psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) +static int psci_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) { int err, i; -- 2.8.1