From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:32:58 +0300 Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/19] net: hns: bugfix about pfc pause frame statistics In-Reply-To: <1466481399-70080-11-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> References: <1466481399-70080-1-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> <1466481399-70080-11-git-send-email-Yisen.Zhuang@huawei.com> Message-ID: <1466505178.30123.201.camel@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:56 +0800, Yisen Zhuang wrote: > From: Daode Huang > > For SoC hip06, PFC pause handled in dsaf, while hip05 in XGMAC, > so change the statistics of pfc pause in dsaf and remove the old > pfc pause frame statistics. > > +static char *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats_strings(char *data, int node, > + ?????struct dsaf_device > *dsaf_dev) > ?{ > ? char *buff = data; > + int i; > + bool is_ver1 = AE_IS_VER1(dsaf_dev->dsaf_ver); > ? > ? snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "innod%d_pad_drop_pkts", > node); > ? buff = buff + ETH_GSTRING_LEN; > @@ -2502,6 +2530,18 @@ static char > *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats_strings(char *data, int node) > ? buff = buff + ETH_GSTRING_LEN; > ? snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, "innod%d_stp_drop_pkts", > node); > ? buff = buff + ETH_GSTRING_LEN; > + if ((node < DSAF_SERVICE_NW_NUM) && (!is_ver1)) { Redundant parens. > + for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { > + snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, > + ?"inod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); > + buff = buff + ETH_GSTRING_LEN; buff += ... > + } > + for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { > + snprintf(buff, ETH_GSTRING_LEN, > + ?"onod%d_pfc_prio%d_pkts", node, i); > + buff = buff + ETH_GSTRING_LEN; Ditto. > ?{ > ? u64 *p = data; > + int i; > ? struct dsaf_hw_stats *hw_stats = &ddev->hw_stats[node_num]; > + bool is_ver1 = AE_IS_VER1(ddev->dsaf_ver); > ? > ? p[0] = hw_stats->pad_drop; > ? p[1] = hw_stats->man_pkts; > @@ -2527,8 +2569,16 @@ static u64 *hns_dsaf_get_node_stats(struct > dsaf_device *ddev, u64 *data, > ? p[10] = hw_stats->local_addr_false; > ? p[11] = hw_stats->vlan_drop; > ? p[12] = hw_stats->stp_drop; > - p[13] = hw_stats->tx_pkts; > + if ((node_num < DSAF_SERVICE_NW_NUM) && (!is_ver1)) { > + for (i = 0; i < DSAF_PRIO_NR; i++) { > + p[13 + i] = hw_stats->rx_pfc[i]; > + p[13 + i + DSAF_PRIO_NR] = hw_stats- > >tx_pfc[i]; > + } Two different approaches how to assign data. Above uses 2 for-loops, here you put everything to one. > + p[29] = hw_stats->tx_pkts; > + return &p[30]; > + } > ? > + p[13] = hw_stats->tx_pkts; > ? return &p[14]; > ?} -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy