public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eddie.huang@mediatek.com (Eddie Huang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:45:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466574342.27791.8.camel@mtksdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160621095748.GE28248@8bytes.org>

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:57 +0800, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> 
> Okay, I pushed my arm/mediatek branch to my tree at
> 
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git
> 
> Please base the patch on that branch and re-send.
> 

I think it is better let Mediatek SoC maintainer Matthias to accept dtsi
patch like other drivers. This can avoid dtsi conflict. As I
remember,last time MT8173 IOMMU dtsi patch accepted in iommu tree and
mt8173.dtsi had conflict with arm soc tree at the merge window. Honghui
should resend this patch to Matthias, and elaborate your dependency with
clock and power domain dtsi, then Matthias know the merge sequence. 

Eddie
Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-22  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-08  9:50 [PATCH v4 0/5] MT2701 iommu support honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-08  9:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: mediatek: add descriptions for mediatek mt2701 iommu and smi honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-08  9:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] iommu/mediatek: move the common struct into header file honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-08  9:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701 honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-08  9:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-08  9:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701 honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2016-06-21  9:41   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-06-21  9:55     ` Honghui Zhang
2016-06-21  9:57   ` Joerg Roedel
2016-06-22  5:45     ` Eddie Huang [this message]
2016-06-22  7:45       ` Honghui Zhang
2016-06-22  8:31         ` Joerg Roedel
2016-06-22  8:39           ` Honghui Zhang
2016-06-22  8:58             ` Joerg Roedel
2016-07-03  6:24   ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-03 19:12     ` Matthias Brugger
2016-07-04  1:32       ` Honghui Zhang
2016-07-04  8:00         ` Matthias Brugger
2017-01-13 14:54           ` Matthias Brugger
2017-01-16  2:48             ` Honghui Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466574342.27791.8.camel@mtksdaap41 \
    --to=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox