* [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors
[not found] <1466588198-27445-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
@ 2016-06-22 9:36 ` Ben Dooks
2016-06-22 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-22 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: exynos: " Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2016-06-22 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
are endian safe.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
index 4f4e9df..6bab65b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void s5pv210_set_refresh(enum s5pv210_dmc_port ch, unsigned long freq)
tmp1 /= tmp;
- __raw_writel(tmp1, reg);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp1, reg);
}
static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
@@ -297,29 +297,29 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
* 1. Temporary Change divider for MFC and G3D
* SCLKA2M(200/1=200)->(200/4=50)Mhz
*/
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(3 << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
/* For MFC, G3D dividing */
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
/*
* 2. Change SCLKA2M(200Mhz)to SCLKMPLL in MFC_MUX, G3D MUX
* (200/4=50)->(667/4=166)Mhz
*/
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(1 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
} while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
/*
@@ -331,19 +331,19 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
s5pv210_set_refresh(DMC1, 133000);
/* 4. SCLKAPLL -> SCLKMPLL */
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
reg |= (0x1 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
} while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
}
/* Change divider */
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_DIV0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV0_APLL_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_A2M_MASK |
S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK200_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK100_MASK |
@@ -359,25 +359,25 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
(clkdiv_val[index][6] << S5P_CLKDIV0_HCLK133_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][7] << S5P_CLKDIV0_PCLK66_SHIFT));
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV0);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & 0xff);
/* ARM MCS value changed */
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
reg &= ~0x3;
if (index >= L3)
reg |= 0x3;
else
reg |= 0x1;
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_ARM_MCS_CON);
if (pll_changing) {
/* 5. Set Lock time = 30us*24Mhz = 0x2cf */
- __raw_writel(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
+ writel_relaxed(0x2cf, S5P_APLL_LOCK);
/*
* 6. Turn on APLL
@@ -385,12 +385,12 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
* 6-2. Wait untile the PLL is locked
*/
if (index == L0)
- __raw_writel(APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
+ writel_relaxed(APLL_VAL_1000, S5P_APLL_CON);
else
- __raw_writel(APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
+ writel_relaxed(APLL_VAL_800, S5P_APLL_CON);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_APLL_CON);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_APLL_CON);
} while (!(reg & (0x1 << 29)));
/*
@@ -398,39 +398,39 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
* to SCLKA2M(200Mhz) in MFC_MUX and G3D MUX
* (667/4=166)->(200/4=50)Mhz
*/
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_SRC2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(0 << S5P_CLKSRC2_MFC_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC2);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT1);
} while (reg & ((1 << 7) | (1 << 3)));
/*
* 8. Change divider for MFC and G3D
* (200/4=50)->(200/1=200)Mhz
*/
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_DIV2);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_MASK | S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_MASK);
reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][10] << S5P_CLKDIV2_G3D_SHIFT) |
(clkdiv_val[index][9] << S5P_CLKDIV2_MFC_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV2);
/* For MFC, G3D dividing */
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT0);
} while (reg & ((1 << 16) | (1 << 17)));
/* 9. Change MPLL to APLL in MSYS_MUX */
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_SRC0);
reg &= ~(S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_MASK);
reg |= (0x0 << S5P_CLKSRC0_MUX200_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_SRC0);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKMUX_STAT0);
} while (reg & (0x1 << 18));
/*
@@ -447,13 +447,13 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
* and memory refresh parameter should be changed
*/
if (bus_speed_changing) {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLK_DIV6);
reg &= ~S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_MASK;
reg |= (clkdiv_val[index][8] << S5P_CLKDIV6_ONEDRAM_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
+ writel_relaxed(reg, S5P_CLK_DIV6);
do {
- reg = __raw_readl(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT1);
+ reg = readl_relaxed(S5P_CLKDIV_STAT1);
} while (reg & (1 << 15));
/* Reconfigure DRAM refresh counter value */
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ static int check_mem_type(void __iomem *dmc_reg)
{
unsigned long val;
- val = __raw_readl(dmc_reg + 0x4);
+ val = readl_relaxed(dmc_reg + 0x4);
val = (val & (0xf << 8));
return val >> 8;
@@ -538,10 +538,10 @@ static int s5pv210_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
}
/* Find current refresh counter and frequency each DMC */
- s5pv210_dram_conf[0].refresh = (__raw_readl(dmc_base[0] + 0x30) * 1000);
+ s5pv210_dram_conf[0].refresh = (readl_relaxed(dmc_base[0] + 0x30) * 1000);
s5pv210_dram_conf[0].freq = clk_get_rate(dmc0_clk);
- s5pv210_dram_conf[1].refresh = (__raw_readl(dmc_base[1] + 0x30) * 1000);
+ s5pv210_dram_conf[1].refresh = (readl_relaxed(dmc_base[1] + 0x30) * 1000);
s5pv210_dram_conf[1].freq = clk_get_rate(dmc1_clk);
policy->suspend_freq = SLEEP_FREQ;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: exynos: use relaxed IO accesors
[not found] <1466588198-27445-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
2016-06-22 9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors Ben Dooks
@ 2016-06-22 9:36 ` Ben Dooks
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2016-06-22 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
are endian safe.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index c0f3373..7a5707f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int init_div_table(void)
tmp = (clk_div | ema_div | (volt_id << P0_7_VDD_SHIFT)
| ((freq / FREQ_UNIT) << P0_7_FREQ_SHIFT));
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMU_P0_7 + 4 *
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMU_P0_7 + 4 *
(pos - freq_tbl));
}
@@ -169,17 +169,17 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(unsigned int cur_frequency)
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
/* Disable DVFS */
- __raw_writel(0, dvfs_info->base + XMU_DVFS_CTRL);
+ writel_relaxed(0, dvfs_info->base + XMU_DVFS_CTRL);
/* Enable PSTATE Change Event */
- tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUEVTEN);
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUEVTEN);
tmp |= (1 << PSTATE_CHANGED_EVTEN_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUEVTEN);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUEVTEN);
/* Enable PSTATE Change IRQ */
- tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQEN);
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQEN);
tmp |= (1 << PSTATE_CHANGED_IRQEN_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQEN);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQEN);
/* Set initial performance index */
cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, freq_table)
@@ -197,14 +197,14 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(unsigned int cur_frequency)
cur_frequency);
for (cpu = 0; cpu < CONFIG_NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
- tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4);
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4);
tmp &= ~(P_VALUE_MASK << C0_3_PSTATE_NEW_SHIFT);
tmp |= ((pos - freq_table) << C0_3_PSTATE_NEW_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4);
}
/* Enable DVFS */
- __raw_writel(1 << XMU_DVFS_CTRL_EN_SHIFT,
+ writel_relaxed(1 << XMU_DVFS_CTRL_EN_SHIFT,
dvfs_info->base + XMU_DVFS_CTRL);
}
@@ -223,11 +223,11 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
/* Set the target frequency in all C0_3_PSTATE register */
for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) {
- tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
tmp &= ~(P_VALUE_MASK << C0_3_PSTATE_NEW_SHIFT);
tmp |= (index << C0_3_PSTATE_NEW_SHIFT);
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + i * 4);
}
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock);
return 0;
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
freqs.old = policy->cur;
- cur_pstate = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_P_STATUS);
+ cur_pstate = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_P_STATUS);
if (cur_pstate >> C0_3_PSTATE_VALID_SHIFT & 0x1)
index = (cur_pstate >> C0_3_PSTATE_CURR_SHIFT) & P_VALUE_MASK;
else
@@ -270,9 +270,9 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos_cpufreq_irq(int irq, void *id)
{
unsigned int tmp;
- tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQ);
+ tmp = readl_relaxed(dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQ);
if (tmp >> PSTATE_CHANGED_SHIFT & 0x1) {
- __raw_writel(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQ);
+ writel_relaxed(tmp, dvfs_info->base + XMU_PMUIRQ);
disable_irq_nosync(irq);
schedule_work(&dvfs_info->irq_work);
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors
2016-06-22 9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors Ben Dooks
@ 2016-06-22 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-22 12:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2016-06-22 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 22-06-16, 10:36, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
> sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
> are endian safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
For both patches:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors
2016-06-22 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2016-06-22 12:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2016-06-22 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 22-06-16, 10:36, Ben Dooks wrote:
>> The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
>> sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
>> are endian safe.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>> Cc: linux-pm at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> For both patches:
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Applied for v4.8, thanks.
When resending the cpufreq-exynos please CC me as well.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-22 12:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1466588198-27445-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
2016-06-22 9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: use relaxed IO accesors Ben Dooks
2016-06-22 9:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-22 12:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-06-22 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: exynos: " Ben Dooks
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).