* [PATCH] mailbox: pl320: remove __raw IO
@ 2016-06-22 9:49 Ben Dooks
2016-06-22 13:39 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2016-06-22 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
are endian safe.
Note, this has not been run-time tested.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.c b/drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.c
index f80acb3..2dbed87 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/pl320-ipc.c
@@ -58,29 +58,29 @@ static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ipc_notifier);
static inline void set_destination(int source, int mbox)
{
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(mbox));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(mbox));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(mbox));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(mbox));
}
static inline void clear_destination(int source, int mbox)
{
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxDCLEAR(mbox));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxMCLEAR(mbox));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxDCLEAR(mbox));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(source), ipc_base + IPCMxMCLEAR(mbox));
}
static void __ipc_send(int mbox, u32 *data)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
- __raw_writel(data[i], ipc_base + IPCMxDR(mbox, i));
- __raw_writel(0x1, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(mbox));
+ writel_relaxed(data[i], ipc_base + IPCMxDR(mbox, i));
+ writel_relaxed(0x1, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(mbox));
}
static u32 __ipc_rcv(int mbox, u32 *data)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 7; i++)
- data[i] = __raw_readl(ipc_base + IPCMxDR(mbox, i));
+ data[i] = readl_relaxed(ipc_base + IPCMxDR(mbox, i));
return data[1];
}
@@ -112,15 +112,15 @@ static irqreturn_t ipc_handler(int irq, void *dev)
u32 irq_stat;
u32 data[7];
- irq_stat = __raw_readl(ipc_base + IPCMMIS(1));
+ irq_stat = readl_relaxed(ipc_base + IPCMMIS(1));
if (irq_stat & MBOX_MASK(IPC_TX_MBOX)) {
- __raw_writel(0, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_TX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(0, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_TX_MBOX));
complete(&ipc_completion);
}
if (irq_stat & MBOX_MASK(IPC_RX_MBOX)) {
__ipc_rcv(IPC_RX_MBOX, data);
atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ipc_notifier, data[0], data + 1);
- __raw_writel(2, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_RX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(2, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_RX_MBOX));
}
return IRQ_HANDLED;
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int pl320_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
if (ipc_base == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- __raw_writel(0, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_TX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(0, ipc_base + IPCMxSEND(IPC_TX_MBOX));
ipc_irq = adev->irq[0];
ret = request_irq(ipc_irq, ipc_handler, 0, dev_name(&adev->dev), NULL);
@@ -154,20 +154,20 @@ static int pl320_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
goto err;
/* Init slow mailbox */
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxSOURCE(IPC_TX_MBOX));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(IPC_TX_MBOX));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE) | CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(IPC_TX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxSOURCE(IPC_TX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(IPC_TX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE) | CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(IPC_TX_MBOX));
/* Init receive mailbox */
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxSOURCE(IPC_RX_MBOX));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(IPC_RX_MBOX));
- __raw_writel(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE) | CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
- ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(IPC_RX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxSOURCE(IPC_RX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxDSET(IPC_RX_MBOX));
+ writel_relaxed(CHAN_MASK(M3_SOURCE) | CHAN_MASK(A9_SOURCE),
+ ipc_base + IPCMxMSET(IPC_RX_MBOX));
return 0;
err:
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mailbox: pl320: remove __raw IO
2016-06-22 9:49 [PATCH] mailbox: pl320: remove __raw IO Ben Dooks
@ 2016-06-22 13:39 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2016-06-22 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> The use of __raw IO accesors is not endian safe and should be used
> sparingly. The relaxed variants should be as lightweight and also
> are endian safe.
>
> Note, this has not been run-time tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-22 13:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-22 9:49 [PATCH] mailbox: pl320: remove __raw IO Ben Dooks
2016-06-22 13:39 ` Rob Herring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).