From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: slemieux.tyco@gmail.com (Sylvain Lemieux)
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 09:43:35 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] clk: lpc32xx: allow peripheral clock selection in
 device tree
In-Reply-To: <1466512531.2114.6.camel@localhost>
References: <1464982475-24738-1-git-send-email-slemieux.tyco@gmail.com>
 <f8778993-a393-f72a-ba76-76550a9c5bbd@mleia.com>
 <1466512531.2114.6.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <1467639815.9582.3.camel@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Stephan,

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 08:35 -0400, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 07:28 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > Hi Sylvain,
> > 
> > On 03.06.2016 22:34, Sylvain Lemieux wrote:
> > > From: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> > > 
> > > This patch add the support to select the peripheral clock (PERIPH)
> > > as a parent clock source using the "assigned-clock-parents"
> > > parameter in the device tree.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux@tycoint.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
> > 
> > The change looks good, is it done to support a selection of PWM parent clocks?
> 
> Yes, this is the case.
> > 
> > I think it makes sense to set PERIPH clock as a default parent for both
> > PWM controllers, please consider to send a DTS change.
> 
> I will do.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback,
> Sylvain
> 
do you think you can take this change for 4.8?


Regards,
Sylvain