From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:43:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drivers: reset: Add STM32 reset driver
In-Reply-To: <577D264A.4050709@st.com>
References: <1467640052-6770-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
 <1467640052-6770-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
 <1467653810.2224.77.camel@pengutronix.de> <577B61EA.5080703@st.com>
 <1467725370.2978.64.camel@pengutronix.de> <577D264A.4050709@st.com>
Message-ID: <1467819838.2914.6.camel@pengutronix.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Am Mittwoch, den 06.07.2016, 17:39 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez:
> Hi Philipp
> 
> On 07/05/2016 03:29 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez:
> > [...]
> >>>> +static const struct reset_control_ops stm32_reset_ops = {
> >>>> +	.assert		= stm32_reset_assert,
> >>>> +	.deassert	= stm32_reset_deassert,
> >>> Are the registers not readable, or did you choose not to
> >>> implement .status on purpose?
> >> We choose to not implement.
> > Ok. Because of size issues or just because you don't need them in any of
> > your drivers?
> Because i don't need them.

Ok, thanks for clarifying.

regards
Philipp