From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 09:30:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469896245.3998.113.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469877735-30127-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
On Sat, 2016-07-30 at 13:22 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
> gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
> ? arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
> ? warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
> ????????<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
>
> As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
> ?- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
> ?- once by the shift operation '<<'
> ?- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
>
> Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
> ?- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
>
> It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
> used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
> overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
> check a gpio activation.
It may be better to change the charger_wakeup callback return
value from unsigned long to bool and modify the other use in
spitz_pm.c?
$ git grep -w charger_wakeup
arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c:???.charger_wakeup??= corgi_charger_wakeup,
arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.c:?????????????????if (sharpsl_pm.machinfo->charger_wakeup() != 0)
arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.c:?????????if (sharpsl_pm.machinfo->charger_wakeup())
arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.h: unsigned long (*charger_wakeup)(void);
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:???.charger_wakeup???= spitz_charger_wakeup,
> Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
> gpio register")
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> ---
> Since v1: replaced binary ORs with logical ORs after assembly comparison
> ---
> ?arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c | 8 +++-----
> ?arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c | 5 ++---
> ?2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c
> index d9206811be9b..8dc39d602884 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/corgi_pm.c
> @@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ static unsigned long corgi_charger_wakeup(void)
> ?{
> ? unsigned long ret;
> ?
> - ret = (!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN) << GPIO_bit(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN))
> - | (!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT)
> - << GPIO_bit(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT))
> - | (!gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP)
> - << GPIO_bit(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP));
> + ret = !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_AC_IN)
> + || !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_KEY_INT)
> + || !gpio_get_value(CORGI_GPIO_WAKEUP);
> ? return ret;
> ?}
> ?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c
> index ea9f9034cb54..dd85869f6f99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c
> @@ -168,9 +168,8 @@ static int spitz_should_wakeup(unsigned int resume_on_alarm)
> ?static unsigned long spitz_charger_wakeup(void)
> ?{
> ? unsigned long ret;
> - ret = ((!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
> - << GPIO_bit(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT))
> - | gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_SYNC));
> + ret = !gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
> + || gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_SYNC);
> ? return ret;
> ?}
> ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-30 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-30 11:22 [PATCH v2] ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts Robert Jarzmik
2016-07-30 16:30 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-07-31 9:12 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1469896245.3998.113.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox