linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ?
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:55:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470387358.3141.17.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3400649.NoVKUzu81R@wuerfel>

Am Samstag, den 30.07.2016, 22:13 +0200 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Friday, July 29, 2016 3:08:15 PM CEST Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Hi Masahiro,
> > 
> > Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2016, 19:29 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> > [...]
> > > However, I think the following makes more sense:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > menuconfig RESET_CONTROLLER
> > >         bool "Reset Controller Support"
> > >         depends on (ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER || COMPILE_TEST)
> > >         default y
> > >         help
> > >           Generic Reset Controller support.
> > 
> > That looks sensible to me. You'll only have to enable the reset
> > controller framework if either some enabled architecture has a reset
> > controller (in which case you want the driver for it to be activated by
> > default), or if you want to compile test some of the reset drivers.
> 
> This still doesn't let a platform 'select RESET_FOO', unless they
> also select RESET_CONTROLLER and ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER.
> 
> Why do we need to guard all drivers inside of two symbols?

Does the platform have to select RESET_FOO at all? Wouldn't it be enough
for RESET_FOO to have "default ARCH_FOO" ?

Currently ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER is used to default y the
RESET_CONTROLLER symbol. Maybe we should add another
ARCH_REQUIRE_RESET_CONTROLLER and have that select RESET_CONTROLLER,
similarly to how it is done for GPIOLIB?

config ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
	bool
	help
	  Selecting this option from the architecture Kconfig enables
	  the RESET_CONTROLLER framework by default but does not select
	  it. Use it for architectures that still work without reset
	  controller support and thus allow the user to disable it.

config ARCH_REQUIRE_RESET_CONTROLLER
	bool
	select RESET_CONTROLLER
	help
	  Selecting this option from the architecture Kconfig selects
	  the RESET_CONTROLLER framework. Use it for architectures that
	  should not be built without the reset controller framework
	  enabled.

menuconfig RESET_CONTROLLER
        bool "Reset Controller Support"
        default ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER || COMPILE_TEST
        help
          Generic Reset Controller support.

          This framework is designed to abstract reset handling of devices
          via GPIOs or SoC-internal reset controller modules.

          If unsure, say no.

The platforms could then select one of the ARCH_*_RESET_CONTROLLER
symbols and nobody would have to select RESET_CONTROLLER directly, for
example:

menuconfig ARCH_TEGRA                                                                                                                         
        bool "NVIDIA Tegra"
        depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7
        select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
        select ARCH_REQUIRE_RESET_CONTROLLER
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS
        select ARM_AMBA
        select ARM_GIC
        select CLKSRC_MMIO
        select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
        select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
        select PINCTRL
        select PM_OPP
        select SOC_BUS
        help
          This enables support for NVIDIA Tegra based systems.

regards
Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-05  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-23 11:22 Why do we need reset_control_get_optional() ? Masahiro Yamada
2016-07-28  9:43 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-28 10:09   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-28 10:52     ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-07-28 11:00       ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-05 15:50         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-08 16:39           ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-08 21:39             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-16 14:36             ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24  6:58               ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 12:30                 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-28 10:56     ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-28 10:29   ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-07-29 13:08     ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-30 20:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-05  8:55         ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2016-08-05 15:35           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-08 17:29             ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-16  9:41             ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:29               ` Philipp Zabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470387358.3141.17.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).